3.8OCJul 9
3DIOC: Direct Data-Driven Inverse Optimal Control for LTI SystemsChendi Qu, Jianping He, Xiaoming Duan
This paper addresses the Direct Data-Driven Inverse Optimal Control (3DIOC) problem for linear time-invariant (LTI) systems under the linear quadratic (LQ) control. Unlike traditional approaches that require system identification, the proposed method learns the underlying objective function directly from measured input-output trajectories. Leveraging the input-output representation of LTI systems via the Fundamental Lemma, we derive a model-free optimality necessary condition (ONC) for the forward LQ problem, which forms the basis for formulating and solving an inverse optimal control problem. We also provide an identifiability condition to ensure the uniqueness of the inverse solution. While the ONC-based IOC approach is effective in the noise-free case, its performance is not promising when the data is corrupted with noises. We then reformulate the 3DIOC as a bi-level optimization problem, which is solved using iterative gradient descent and offers solution guarantees. Furthermore, we analyze the relationship between the solution sets of the two proposed formulations, providing practical insights into their selection. The simulation results validate the effectiveness and performance of our proposed methods.
20.4ROMay 1
Learning while Deploying: Fleet-Scale Reinforcement Learning for Generalist Robot PoliciesYi Wang, Xinchen Li, Pengwei Xie et al.
Generalist robot policies increasingly benefit from large-scale pretraining, but offline data alone is insufficient for robust real-world deployment. Deployed robots encounter distribution shifts, long-tail failures, task variations, and human correction opportunities that fixed demonstration datasets cannot fully capture. We present Learning While Deploying (LWD), a fleet-scale offline-to-online reinforcement learning framework for continual post-training of generalist Vision-Language-Action (VLA) policies. Starting from a pretrained VLA policy, LWD closes the loop between deployment, shared physical experience, policy improvement, and redeployment by using autonomous rollouts and human interventions collected across a robot fleet. To stabilize learning from heterogeneous, sparse-reward fleet data, LWD combines Distributional Implicit Value Learning (DIVL) for robust value estimation with Q-learning via Adjoint Matching (QAM) for policy extraction in flow-based VLA action generators. We validate LWD on a fleet of 16 dual-arm robots across eight real-world manipulation tasks, including semantic grocery restocking and 3--5 minute long-horizon tasks. A single generalist policy improves as fleet experience accumulates, reaching an average success rate of 95%, with the largest gains on long-horizon tasks.
2.0LGDec 27, 2023
Model Selection for Inverse Reinforcement Learning via Structural Risk MinimizationChendi Qu, Jianping He, Xiaoming Duan et al.
Inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) usually assumes the reward function model is pre-specified as a weighted sum of features and estimates the weighting parameters only. However, how to select features and determine a proper reward model is nontrivial and experience-dependent. A simplistic model is less likely to contain the ideal reward function, while a model with high complexity leads to substantial computation cost and potential overfitting. This paper addresses this trade-off in the model selection for IRL problems by introducing the structural risk minimization (SRM) framework from statistical learning. SRM selects an optimal reward function class from a hypothesis set minimizing both estimation error and model complexity. To formulate an SRM scheme for IRL, we estimate the policy gradient from given demonstration as the empirical risk, and establish the upper bound of Rademacher complexity as the model penalty of hypothesis function classes. The SRM learning guarantee is further presented. In particular, we provide the explicit form for the linear weighted sum setting. Simulations demonstrate the performance and efficiency of our algorithm.