Lukas Lamminger

Poorya MohammadiNasab, Ander Biguri, Philipp Steininger et al.

Iterative reconstruction technique's ability to reduce radiation exposure by using fewer projections has attracted significant attention. However, these methods typically require a precise tuning of several hyperparameters, which can have a major impact on reconstruction quality. Manually setting these parameters is time-consuming and increases the workload for human operators. In this paper, we introduce a novel fully automatic parameter optimization framework that can be applied to a wide range of Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) iterative reconstruction algorithms to determine optimal parameters without requiring a reference reconstruction. The proposed method incorporates a modified crow search algorithm (CSA) featuring a superior set-dependent local search mechanism, a search-space-aware global search strategy, and an objective-driven balance between local and global search. Additionally, to ensure an effective initial population, we propose a chaotic diagonal linear uniform initialization scheme that accelerates algorithm convergence. The performance of the proposed framework was evaluated on three imaging machines and four real datasets, as well as three different iterative reconstruction methods with the highest number of tunable parameters, representing the most challenging senario. The results indicate that the proposed method could outperform manual settings and CSA, with an 4.19% improvement in average fitness and 4.89% and 3.82% improvements on CHILL@UK and RPI_AXIS, respectively, which are two benchmark no-reference learning-based quality metrics. In addition, the qualitative results clearly show the superiority of the proposed method by maintaining fine details sharply. The overall performance of the proposed framework across different comparison scenarios demonstrates its effectiveness and robustness across all cases.

Maximilian Tschuchnig, Lukas Lamminger, Philipp Steininger et al.

Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) is widely used for real-time intraoperative imaging due to its low radiation dose and high acquisition speed. However, despite its high resolution, CBCT suffers from significant artifacts and thereby lower visual quality, compared to conventional Computed Tomography (CT). A recent approach to mitigate these artifacts is synthetic CT (sCT) generation, translating CBCT volumes into the CT domain. In this work, we enhance sCT generation through multimodal learning, integrating intraoperative CBCT with preoperative CT. Beyond validation on two real-world datasets, we use a versatile synthetic dataset, to analyze how CBCT-CT alignment and CBCT quality affect sCT quality. The results demonstrate that multimodal sCT consistently outperform unimodal baselines, with the most significant gains observed in well-aligned, low-quality CBCT-CT cases. Finally, we demonstrate that these findings are highly reproducible in real-world clinical datasets.

Maximilian Tschuchnig, Lukas Lamminger, Philipp Steininger et al.

Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) is widely used for intraoperative imaging due to its rapid acquisition and low radiation dose. However, CBCT images typically suffer from artifacts and lower visual quality compared to conventional Computed Tomography (CT). A promising solution is synthetic CT (sCT) generation, where CBCT volumes are translated into the CT domain. In this work, we enhance sCT generation through multimodal learning by jointly leveraging intraoperative CBCT and preoperative CT data. To overcome the inherent misalignment between modalities, we introduce an end-to-end learnable registration module within the sCT pipeline. This model is evaluated on a controlled synthetic dataset, allowing precise manipulation of data quality and alignment parameters. Further, we validate its robustness and generalizability on two real-world clinical datasets. Experimental results demonstrate that integrating registration in multimodal sCT generation improves sCT quality, outperforming baseline multimodal methods in 79 out of 90 evaluation settings. Notably, the improvement is most significant in cases where CBCT quality is low and the preoperative CT is moderately misaligned.