Hefei Xu

Yu Wang, Yonghui Yang, Le Wu et al.

Group relative policy optimization (GRPO) has become a standard post-training paradigm for improving reasoning and preference alignment in large language models (LLMs), and has recently shown strong effectiveness in LLM-based recommender systems. However, extending GRPO-based reasoning pipelines to multimodal sequential recommendation (MSR) with multimodal large language models (MLLMs) faces fundamental obstacles. First, MSR requires jointly encoding visual content for both historical interactions and multiple candidate items, causing visual tokens to dominate the input and making the cost of group-based rollout scale with history length and candidate set size, which renders GRPO-based training prohibitively expensive. Second, existing Chain-of-Thought (CoT) supervision suffers from reward inflation in recommendation scenarios, where higher training rewards do not reliably translate into improved ranking performance and may induce shortcut learning. To address these challenges, we propose MLLMRec-R1, an efficient and stable GRPO-based reasoning framework for multimodal sequential recommendation. MLLMRec-R1 textualizes visual signals offline to eliminate expensive visual tokens while preserving multimodal semantics, and constructs high-quality multimodal CoT supervision through refinement and confidence-aware assessment. Furthermore, a mixed-grained data augmentation strategy selectively injects reliable CoT samples while retaining standard training data, mitigating reward inflation and improving generalization stability. Extensive experiments on three benchmark datasets demonstrate that MLLMRec-R1 consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods, establishing a practical and effective GRPO-based reasoning pipeline for multimodal sequential recommendation. The code is available at https://github.com/wangyu0627/MLLMRec-R1.

Hefei Xu, Le Wu, Yu Wang et al.

As large language models (LLMs) increasingly shape content generation, interaction, and decision-making across the Web, aligning them with human values has become a central objective in trustworthy AI. This challenge becomes even more pronounced when aligning multiple, potentially conflicting human values. Although recent approaches, such as reward reweighting, prompt-based supervised fine-tuning, and model merging, attempt to tackle multi-value alignment, they still face two major limitations: (1) training separate models for each value combination is prohibitively expensive; (2) value conflicts substantially degrade alignment performance. These limitations make it difficult to achieve favorable trade-offs across diverse human values. To address these challenges, we revisit multi-value alignment from the perspective of value consistency in data and propose VC-soup, a data filtering and parameter merging framework grounded in value-consistent learning. We first design a value consistency metric based on the cosine similarity between the reward-gap vector of each preference pair and an all-ones vector, which quantifies its cross-value coherence. We then filter out low-consistency preference pairs in each value dataset and train on the remaining data to obtain smooth, value-consistent policy models that better preserve linear mode connectivity. Finally, we linearly combine these policies and apply Pareto filtering across values to obtain solutions with balanced multi-value performance. Extensive experiments and theoretical analysis demonstrate that VC-soup effectively mitigates conflicts and consistently outperforms existing multi-value alignment methods.