Amel Mammar

Steve Jeffrey Tueno Fotso, Marc Frappier, Amel Mammar et al.

In this paper, we use a combination of the SysML/KAOS requirements engineering method, an extension of SysML, with concepts of the KAOS goal model, and of the B System formal method. Translation rules from a SysML/KAOS goal model to a B System specification have been defined. They allow to obtain a skeleton of the B System specification. To complete it, we have defined a language to express the domain model associated to the goal model. The translation of this domain model gives the structural part of the B System specification. The contribution of this paper is the description of translation rules from SysML/KAOS domain models to B System specifications. We also present the formal verification of these rules and we describe an open source tool that implements the languages and the rules. Finally, we provide a review of the application of the SysML/KAOS method on case studies such as for the formal specification of the hybrid ERTMS/ETCS level 3 standard.

Steve Jeffrey Tueno Fotso, Marc Frappier, Régine Laleau et al.

This paper is related to the generalised/generic version of the SysML/KAOS domain metamodel and on translation and back propagation rules between the new domain models and B System specifications.

Steve Tueno, Régine Laleau, Amel Mammar et al.

Nowadays, the usefulness of a formal language for ensuring the consistency of requirements is well established. The work presented here is part of the definition of a formally-grounded, model-based requirements engineering method for critical and complex systems. Requirements are captured through the SysML/KAOS method and the targeted formal specification is written using the Event-B method. Firstly, an Event-B skeleton is produced from the goal hierarchy provided by the SysML/KAOS goal model. This skeleton is then completed in a second step by the Event-B specification obtained from system application domain properties that gives rise to the system structure. Considering that the domain is represented using ontologies through the SysML/KAOS Domain Model method, is it possible to automatically produce the structural part of system Event-B models ? This paper proposes a set of generic rules that translate SysML/KAOS domain ontologies into an Event-B specification. The rules have been expressed, verified and validated through the Rodin tool using the Event-B method. They are illustrated through a case study dealing with a landing gear system. Our proposition makes it possible to automatically obtain, from a representation of the system application domain in the form of ontologies, the structural part of the Event-B specification which will be used to formally validate the consistency of system requirements.

Steve Tueno, Régine Laleau, Amel Mammar et al.

A means of building safe critical systems consists of formally modeling the requirements formulated by stakeholders and ensuring their consistency with respect to application domain properties. This paper proposes a metamodel for an ontology modeling formalism based on OWL and PLIB. This modeling formalism is part of a method for modeling the domain of systems whose requirements are captured through SysML/KAOS. The formal semantics of SysML/KAOS goals are represented using Event-B specifications. Goals provide the set of events, while domain models will provide the structure of the system state of the Event-B specification. Our proposal is illustrated through a case study dealing with a Cycab localization component specification. The case study deals with the specification of a localization software component that uses GPS,Wi-Fi and sensor technologies for the realtime localization of the Cycab vehicle, an autonomous ground transportation system designed to be robust and completely independent.