Haoxiang Cheng

Haoxiang Cheng, Yunfei Wang, Chao Chen et al.

Logical rules constitute a cornerstone of knowledge graph (KG) reasoning, valued for their interpretability and ability to model relational patterns. However, existing rule mining methods predominantly focus on simple chain-like rules and therefore neglect the richer relational information encoded in graph-like structures, such as cycles and branches. This limitation is further exacerbated by computational bottlenecks caused by the combinatorial explosion of the search space, which is especially challenging for graph-like rules. Meanwhile, generative approaches such as diffusion models, despite their success in other domains, can not be directly applied to rule mining because their training objectives are not aligned with the goal of learning high-quality rules, and non-differentiable KG rule quality metrics cannot directly guide model optimization. To address these limitations, we propose GRiD, a framework that reformulates graph-like rule discovery as a discrete generative process conditioned on the target relation. GRiD employs a two-phase training strategy. First, supervised pre-training enables GRiD to capture structural priors from subgraphs sampled from the KG meta-graph. Subsequently, reinforcement learning is applied to fine-tune GRiD through policy gradient optimization guided directly by non-differentiable rule-quality metrics. Experiments on six benchmark datasets show that GRiD achieves competitive performance on KG completion tasks. Ablation studies confirm the efficiency and robustness of GRiD and further show that graph-like rules complement chain-like rules in KG completion. Our codes and datasets are available in https://github.com/Haoxiang-Cheng/GRiD

Shixuan Liu, Yue He, Yunfei Wang et al.

Logical rule learning, a prominent category of knowledge graph (KG) reasoning methods, constitutes a critical research area aimed at learning explicit rules from observed facts to infer missing knowledge. However, like all KG reasoning methods, rule learning suffers from a critical weakness-its dependence on the I.I.D. assumption. This assumption can easily be violated due to selection bias during training or agnostic distribution shifts during testing (e.g., as in query shift scenarios), ultimately undermining model performance and reliability. To enable robust KG reasoning in wild environments, this study investigates logical rule learning in the presence of agnostic test-time distribution shifts. We formally define this challenge as out-of-distribution (OOD) KG reasoning-a previously underexplored problem, and propose the Stable Rule Learning (StableRule) framework as a solution. StableRule is an end-to-end framework that combines feature decorrelation with rule learning network, to enhance OOD generalization in KG reasoning. By leveraging feature decorrelation, StableRule mitigates the adverse effects of covariate shifts arising in OOD scenarios, improving the robustness of the rule learning network. Extensive experiments on seven benchmark KGs demonstrate the framework's superior effectiveness and stability across diverse heterogeneous environments, highlighting its practical significance for real-world applications.