Pim Haselager

Simon WS Fischer, Hanna Schraffenberger, Serge Thill et al.

Many generative AI systems as well as decision-support systems (DSSs) provide operators with predictions or recommendations. Various studies show, however, that people can mistakenly adopt the erroneous results presented by those systems. Hence, it is crucial to promote critical thinking and reflection during interaction. One approach we are focusing on involves encouraging reflection during machine-assisted decision-making by presenting decision-makers with data-driven questions. In this short paper, we provide a brief overview of our work in that regard, namely: 1) the development of a question taxonomy, 2) the development of a prototype in the medical domain and the feedback received from clinicians, 3) a method for generating questions using a large language model, and 4) a proposed scale for measuring cognitive engagement in human-AI decision-making. In doing so, we contribute to the discussion about the design, development, and evaluation of tools for thought, i.e., AI systems that provoke critical thinking and enable novel ways of sense-making.

Gabriëlle Ras, Luca Ambrogioni, Pim Haselager et al.

In this paper we introduce the temporally factorized 3D convolution (3TConv) as an interpretable alternative to the regular 3D convolution (3DConv). In a 3TConv the 3D convolutional filter is obtained by learning a 2D filter and a set of temporal transformation parameters, resulting in a sparse filter where the 2D slices are sequentially dependent on each other in the temporal dimension. We demonstrate that 3TConv learns temporal transformations that afford a direct interpretation. The temporal parameters can be used in combination with various existing 2D visualization methods. We also show that insight about what the model learns can be achieved by analyzing the transformation parameter statistics on a layer and model level. Finally, we implicitly demonstrate that, in popular ConvNets, the 2DConv can be replaced with a 3TConv and that the weights can be transferred to yield pretrained 3TConvs. pretrained 3TConvnets leverage more than a decade of work on traditional 2DConvNets by being able to make use of features that have been proven to deliver excellent results on image classification benchmarks.

Gabrielle Ras, Marcel van Gerven, Pim Haselager

Issues regarding explainable AI involve four components: users, laws & regulations, explanations and algorithms. Together these components provide a context in which explanation methods can be evaluated regarding their adequacy. The goal of this chapter is to bridge the gap between expert users and lay users. Different kinds of users are identified and their concerns revealed, relevant statements from the General Data Protection Regulation are analyzed in the context of Deep Neural Networks (DNNs), a taxonomy for the classification of existing explanation methods is introduced, and finally, the various classes of explanation methods are analyzed to verify if user concerns are justified. Overall, it is clear that (visual) explanations can be given about various aspects of the influence of the input on the output. However, it is noted that explanation methods or interfaces for lay users are missing and we speculate which criteria these methods / interfaces should satisfy. Finally it is noted that two important concerns are difficult to address with explanation methods: the concern about bias in datasets that leads to biased DNNs, as well as the suspicion about unfair outcomes.