Auditing for Spatial FairnessDimitris Sacharidis, Giorgos Giannopoulos, George Papastefanatos et al.
This paper studies algorithmic fairness when the protected attribute is location. To handle protected attributes that are continuous, such as age or income, the standard approach is to discretize the domain into predefined groups, and compare algorithmic outcomes across groups. However, applying this idea to location raises concerns of gerrymandering and may introduce statistical bias. Prior work addresses these concerns but only for regularly spaced locations, while raising other issues, most notably its inability to discern regions that are likely to exhibit spatial unfairness. Similar to established notions of algorithmic fairness, we define spatial fairness as the statistical independence of outcomes from location. This translates into requiring that for each region of space, the distribution of outcomes is identical inside and outside the region. To allow for localized discrepancies in the distribution of outcomes, we compare how well two competing hypotheses explain the observed outcomes. The null hypothesis assumes spatial fairness, while the alternate allows different distributions inside and outside regions. Their goodness of fit is then assessed by a likelihood ratio test. If there is no significant difference in how well the two hypotheses explain the observed outcomes, we conclude that the algorithm is spatially fair.
6.7DBMay 15
Fairness-Aware Retrieval Optimization for Retrieval-Augmented GenerationYingqi Zhao, Vasilis Efthymiou, Jyrki Nummenmaa et al.
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) improves reliability of large language models by incorporating external knowledge, but the retrieval process can introduce bias that propagates to generated outputs. This issue is particularly challenging in top-k settings, where multiple documents jointly influence generation. We propose a fairness-aware retrieval framework that models and controls this bias. Our approach combines controlled bias injection via reranking, a position-aware model of bias propagation, and an optimization formulation that balances relevance and fairness. We further introduce a scalable solution based on Quadratic Fairness via Dual Hyperplane Approximation (FARO), which enables efficient optimization through problem decomposition. Experimental results show that our method effectively mitigates generation bias while preserving relevance. This work provides a principled approach for fairness-aware retrieval in RAG systems.
3.3IRFeb 26, 2013
Finding the Right Set of Users: Generalized Constraints for Group RecommendationsKostas Stefanidis, Evaggelia Pitoura
Recently, group recommendations have attracted considerable attention. Rather than recommending items to individual users, group recommenders recommend items to groups of users. In this position paper, we introduce the problem of forming an appropriate group of users to recommend an item when constraints apply to the members of the group. We present a formal model of the problem and an algorithm for its solution. Finally, we identify several directions for future work.