Jon Stephens

Subhasis Dasgupta, Jon Stephens, Amarnath Gupta

We present OLG++, a semantic extension of the Obligation Logic Graph (OLG) for modeling regulatory and legal rules in municipal and interjurisdictional contexts. OLG++ introduces richer node and edge types, including spatial, temporal, party group, defeasibility, and logical grouping constructs, enabling nuanced representations of legal obligations, exceptions, and hierarchies. The model supports structured reasoning over rules with contextual conditions, precedence, and complex triggers. We demonstrate its expressiveness through examples from food business regulations, showing how OLG++ supports legal question answering using property graph queries. OLG++ also improves over LegalRuleML by providing native support for subClassOf, spatial constraints, and reified exception structures. Our examples show that OLG++ is more expressive than prior graph-based models for legal knowledge representation.

Adarsh Pyarelal, Marco A. Valenzuela-Escarcega, Rebecca Sharp et al.

Models of complicated systems can be represented in different ways - in scientific papers, they are represented using natural language text as well as equations. But to be of real use, they must also be implemented as software, thus making code a third form of representing models. We introduce the AutoMATES project, which aims to build semantically-rich unified representations of models from scientific code and publications to facilitate the integration of computational models from different domains and allow for modeling large, complicated systems that span multiple domains and levels of abstraction.

Jesse Bartels, Jon Stephens, Saumya Debray

Dynamic code, i.e., code that is created or modified at runtime, is ubiquitous in today's world. The behavior of dynamic code can depend on the logic of the dynamic code generator in subtle and non-obvious ways, with significant security implications, e.g., JIT compiler bugs can lead to exploitable vulnerabilities in the resulting JIT-compiled code. Existing approaches to program analysis do not provide adequate support for reasoning about such behavioral relationships. This paper takes a first step in addressing this problem by describing a program representation and a new notion of dependency that allows us to reason about dependency and information flow relationships between the dynamic code generator and the generated dynamic code. Experimental results show that analyses based on these concepts are able to capture properties of dynamic code that cannot be identified using traditional program analyses.