MLApr 22
Properties and limitations of geometric tempering for gradient flow dynamicsFrancesca Romana Crucinio, Sahani Pathiraja
We consider the problem of sampling from a probability distribution $π$. It is well known that this can be written as an optimisation problem over the space of probability distributions in which we aim to minimise the Kullback--Leibler divergence from $π$. We consider the effect of replacing $π$ with a sequence of moving targets $(π_t)_{t\ge0}$ defined via geometric tempering on the Wasserstein and Fisher--Rao gradient flows. We show that convergence occurs exponentially in continuous time, providing novel bounds in both cases. We also consider popular time discretisations and explore their convergence properties. We show that in the Fisher--Rao case, replacing the target distribution with a geometric mixture of initial and target distribution never leads to a convergence speed up both in continuous time and in discrete time. Finally, we explore the gradient flow structure of tempered dynamics and derive novel adaptive tempering schedules.
MEJul 6, 2025
A note on the unique properties of the Kullback--Leibler divergence for sampling via gradient flowsFrancesca Romana Crucinio
We consider the problem of sampling from a probability distribution $π$. It is well known that this can be written as an optimisation problem over the space of probability distribution in which we aim to minimise a divergence from $π$. and The optimisation problem is normally solved through gradient flows in the space of probability distribution with an appropriate metric. We show that the Kullback--Leibler divergence is the only divergence in the family of Bregman divergences whose gradient flow w.r.t. many popular metrics does not require knowledge of the normalising constant of $π$.
MLNov 22, 2025
An operator splitting analysis of Wasserstein--Fisher--Rao gradient flowsFrancesca Romana Crucinio, Sahani Pathiraja
Wasserstein-Fisher-Rao (WFR) gradient flows have been recently proposed as a powerful sampling tool that combines the advantages of pure Wasserstein (W) and pure Fisher-Rao (FR) gradient flows. Existing algorithmic developments implicitly make use of operator splitting techniques to numerically approximate the WFR partial differential equation, whereby the W flow is evaluated over a given step size and then the FR flow (or vice versa). This works investigates the impact of the order in which the W and FR operator are evaluated and aims to provide a quantitative analysis. Somewhat surprisingly, we show that with a judicious choice of step size and operator ordering, the split scheme can converge to the target distribution faster than the exact WFR flow (in terms of model time). We obtain variational formulae describing the evolution over one time step of both splitting schemes and investigate in which settings the W-FR split should be preferred to the FR-W split. As a step towards this goal we show that the WFR gradient flow preserves log-concavity and obtain the first sharp decay bound for WFR flow.