Santanu Kumar Dash

Marcos Tileria, Santanu Kumar Dash, Profir-Petru Pârţachi et al.

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in automated software engineering for tasks such as API migration. While LLMs are able to identify migration patterns, they often make mistakes and fail to produce correct glue code to invoke the new API in place of the old one. We call this issue Scaffolding Hallucination, a failure mode where models generate incorrect calling contexts by inventing Phantom Symbols -- such as imaginary imports, constructors, and constants -- that do not exist in the API specification. In this paper, we show that standard metrics cannot be relied upon to detect these instances of hallucination. We propose Hallucination Inspector, a static analysis tool to detect Scaffolding Hallucination in LLM-generated code. Our approach includes a lightweight evaluation framework that verifies symbols extracted from the abstract syntax tree against a knowledge base derived directly from software documentation for the API. A preliminary evaluation on Android API migrations demonstrates that our approach successfully identifies hallucinations and significantly reduces false positives compared to standard metrics and probabilistic judges

Constantin Cezar Petrescu, Sam Smith, Rafail Giavrimis et al.

Developers relax restrictions on a type to reuse methods with other types. While type casts are prevalent, in weakly typed languages such as C++, they are also extremely permissive. Assignments where a source expression is cast into a new type and assigned to a target variable of the new type, can lead to software bugs if performed without care. In this paper, we propose an information-theoretic approach to identify poor implementations of explicit cast operations. Our approach measures accord between the source expression and the target variable using conditional entropy. We collect casts from 34 components of the Chromium project, which collectively account for 27MLOC and random-uniformly sample this dataset to create a manually labelled dataset of 271 casts. Information-theoretic vetting of these 271 casts achieves a peak precision of 81% and a recall of 90%. We additionally present the findings of an in-depth investigation of notable explicit casts, two of which were fixed in recent releases of the Chromium project.

Annie Louis, Santanu Kumar Dash, Earl T. Barr et al.

Comments in software are critical for maintenance and reuse. But apart from prescriptive advice, there is little practical support or quantitative understanding of what makes a comment useful. In this paper, we introduce the task of identifying comments which are uninformative about the code they are meant to document. To address this problem, we introduce the notion of comment entailment from code, high entailment indicating that a comment's natural language semantics can be inferred directly from the code. Although not all entailed comments are low quality, comments that are too easily inferred, for example, comments that restate the code, are widely discouraged by authorities on software style. Based on this, we develop a tool called CRAIC which scores method-level comments for redundancy. Highly redundant comments can then be expanded or alternately removed by the developer. CRAIC uses deep language models to exploit large software corpora without requiring expensive manual annotations of entailment. We show that CRAIC can perform the comment entailment task with good agreement with human judgements. Our findings also have implications for documentation tools. For example, we find that common tags in Javadoc are at least two times more predictable from code than non-Javadoc sentences, suggesting that Javadoc tags are less informative than more free-form comments