CRJul 26, 2024Code
HADES: Detecting Active Directory Attacks via Whole Network Provenance AnalyticsQi Liu, Kaibin Bao, Wajih Ul Hassan et al.
Due to its crucial role in identity and access management in modern enterprise networks, Active Directory (AD) is a top target of Advanced Persistence Threat (APT) actors. Conventional intrusion detection systems (IDS) excel at identifying malicious behaviors caused by malware, but often fail to detect stealthy attacks launched by APT actors. Recent advance in provenance-based IDS (PIDS) shows promises by exposing malicious system activities in causal attack graphs. However, existing approaches are restricted to intra-machine tracing, and unable to reveal the scope of attackers' traversal inside a network. We propose HADES, the first PIDS capable of performing accurate causality-based cross-machine tracing by leveraging a novel concept called logon session based execution partitioning to overcome several challenges in cross-machine tracing. We design HADES as an efficient on-demand tracing system, which performs whole-network tracing only when it first identifies an authentication anomaly signifying an ongoing AD attack, for which we introduce a novel lightweight authentication anomaly detection model rooted in our extensive analysis of AD attacks. To triage attack alerts, we present a new algorithm integrating two key insights we identified in AD attacks. Our evaluations show that HADES outperforms both popular open source detection systems and a prominent commercial AD attack detector.
CRJul 26, 2024
Accurate and Scalable Detection and Investigation of Cyber Persistence ThreatsQi Liu, Muhammad Shoaib, Mati Ur Rehman et al.
In Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) attacks, achieving stealthy persistence within target systems is often crucial for an attacker's success. This persistence allows adversaries to maintain prolonged access, often evading detection mechanisms. Recognizing its pivotal role in the APT lifecycle, this paper introduces Cyber Persistence Detector (CPD), a novel system dedicated to detecting cyber persistence through provenance analytics. CPD is founded on the insight that persistent operations typically manifest in two phases: the "persistence setup" and the subsequent "persistence execution". By causally relating these phases, we enhance our ability to detect persistent threats. First, CPD discerns setups signaling an impending persistent threat and then traces processes linked to remote connections to identify persistence execution activities. A key feature of our system is the introduction of pseudo-dependency edges (pseudo-edges), which effectively connect these disjoint phases using data provenance analysis, and expert-guided edges, which enable faster tracing and reduced log size. These edges empower us to detect persistence threats accurately and efficiently. Moreover, we propose a novel alert triage algorithm that further reduces false positives associated with persistence threats. Evaluations conducted on well-known datasets demonstrate that our system reduces the average false positive rate by 93% compared to state-of-the-art methods.
CRJul 6, 2018
The Influence of Differential Privacy on Short Term Electric Load ForecastingGünther Eibl, Kaibin Bao, Philip-William Grassal et al.
There has been a large number of contributions on privacy-preserving smart metering with Differential Privacy, addressing questions from actual enforcement at the smart meter to billing at the energy provider. However, exploitation is mostly limited to application of cryptographic security means between smart meters and energy providers. We illustrate along the use case of privacy preserving load forecasting that Differential Privacy is indeed a valuable addition that unlocks novel information flows for optimization. We show that (i) there are large differences in utility along three selected forecasting methods, (ii) energy providers can enjoy good utility especially under the linear regression benchmark model, and (iii) households can participate in privacy preserving load forecasting with an individual re-identification risk < 60%, only 10% over random guessing.