Kristofer S. J. Pister

RO
5papers
220citations
Novelty50%
AI Score27

5 Papers

ROAug 31, 2021Code
BotNet: A Simulator for Studying the Effects of Accurate Communication Models on Multi-agent and Swarm Control

Mark Selden, Jason Zhou, Felipe Campos et al.

Decentralized control in multi-robot systems is dependent on accurate and reliable communication between agents. Important communication factors, such as latency and packet delivery ratio, are strong functions of the number of agents in the network. Findings from studies of mobile and high node-count radio-frequency (RF) mesh networks have only been transferred to the domain of multi-robot systems to a limited extent, and typical multi-agent robotic simulators often depend on simple propagation models that do not reflect the behavior of realistic RF networks. In this paper, we present a new open source swarm robotics simulator, BotNet, with an embedded standards-compliant time-synchronized channel hopping (6TiSCH) RF mesh network simulator. Using this simulator we show how more accurate communications models can limit even simple multi-robot control tasks such as flocking and formation control, with agent counts ranging from 10 up to 2500 agents. The experimental results are used to motivate changes to the inter-robot communication propagation models and other networking components currently used in practice in order to bridge the sim-to-real gap.

LGDec 16, 2020
Learning Accurate Long-term Dynamics for Model-based Reinforcement Learning

Nathan O. Lambert, Albert Wilcox, Howard Zhang et al.

Accurately predicting the dynamics of robotic systems is crucial for model-based control and reinforcement learning. The most common way to estimate dynamics is by fitting a one-step ahead prediction model and using it to recursively propagate the predicted state distribution over long horizons. Unfortunately, this approach is known to compound even small prediction errors, making long-term predictions inaccurate. In this paper, we propose a new parametrization to supervised learning on state-action data to stably predict at longer horizons -- that we call a trajectory-based model. This trajectory-based model takes an initial state, a future time index, and control parameters as inputs, and directly predicts the state at the future time index. Experimental results in simulated and real-world robotic tasks show that trajectory-based models yield significantly more accurate long term predictions, improved sample efficiency, and the ability to predict task reward. With these improved prediction properties, we conclude with a demonstration of methods for using the trajectory-based model for control.

ROApr 27, 2020
Learning for Microrobot Exploration: Model-based Locomotion, Sparse-robust Navigation, and Low-power Deep Classification

Nathan O. Lambert, Farhan Toddywala, Brian Liao et al.

Building intelligent autonomous systems at any scale is challenging. The sensing and computation constraints of a microrobot platform make the problems harder. We present improvements to learning-based methods for on-board learning of locomotion, classification, and navigation of microrobots. We show how simulated locomotion can be achieved with model-based reinforcement learning via on-board sensor data distilled into control. Next, we introduce a sparse, linear detector and a Dynamic Thresholding method to FAST Visual Odometry for improved navigation in the noisy regime of mm scale imagery. We end with a new image classifier capable of classification with fewer than one million multiply-and-accumulate (MAC) operations by combining fast downsampling, efficient layer structures and hard activation functions. These are promising steps toward using state-of-the-art algorithms in the power-limited world of edge-intelligence and microrobots.

ROJan 11, 2019
Low Level Control of a Quadrotor with Deep Model-Based Reinforcement Learning

Nathan O. Lambert, Daniel S. Drew, Joseph Yaconelli et al.

Designing effective low-level robot controllers often entail platform-specific implementations that require manual heuristic parameter tuning, significant system knowledge, or long design times. With the rising number of robotic and mechatronic systems deployed across areas ranging from industrial automation to intelligent toys, the need for a general approach to generating low-level controllers is increasing. To address the challenge of rapidly generating low-level controllers, we argue for using model-based reinforcement learning (MBRL) trained on relatively small amounts of automatically generated (i.e., without system simulation) data. In this paper, we explore the capabilities of MBRL on a Crazyflie centimeter-scale quadrotor with rapid dynamics to predict and control at <50Hz. To our knowledge, this is the first use of MBRL for controlled hover of a quadrotor using only on-board sensors, direct motor input signals, and no initial dynamics knowledge. Our controller leverages rapid simulation of a neural network forward dynamics model on a GPU-enabled base station, which then transmits the best current action to the quadrotor firmware via radio. In our experiments, the quadrotor achieved hovering capability of up to 6 seconds with 3 minutes of experimental training data.

ROAug 23, 2018
Decentralized Control of a Hexapod Robot Using a Wireless Time Synchronized Network

James Fang, Dinesh Parimi, Arjun Dhindsa et al.

Robots and control systems rely upon precise timing of sensors and actuators in order to operate intelligently. We present a functioning hexapod robot that walks with a dual tripod gait; each tripod is actuated using its own local controller running on a separate wireless node. We compare and report the results of operating the robot using two different decentralized control schemes. With the first scheme, each controller relies on its own local clock to generate control signals for the tripod it controls. With the second scheme, each controller relies on a variable that is local to itself but that is necessarily the same across controllers as a by-product of their host nodes being part of a time synchronized IEEE802.15.4e network. The gait synchronization error (time difference between what both controllers believe is the start of the gait period) grows linearly when the controllers use their local clocks, but remains bounded to within 112 microseconds when the controllers use their nodes' time synchronized local variable.