Thomas Tienkamp

Bence Mark Halpern, Thomas Tienkamp, Defne Abur et al.

Automatic speech intelligibility assessment is crucial for monitoring speech disorders and therapy efficacy. However, existing methods are difficult to compare: research is fragmented across private datasets with inconsistent protocols. We introduce PathBench, a unified benchmark for pathological speech assessment using public datasets. We compare reference-free, reference-text, and reference-audio methods across three protocols (Matched Content, Extended, and Full) representing how a linguist (controlled stimuli) versus machine learning specialist (maximum data) would approach the same data. We establish benchmark baselines across six datasets, enabling systematic evaluation of future methodological advances, and introduce Dual-ASR Articulatory Precision (DArtP), achieving the highest average correlation among reference-free methods.

Thomas Tienkamp, Fleur van Ast, Roos van der Veen et al.

Surgical treatment for tongue cancer can negatively affect the mobility and musculature of the tongue, which can influence articulatory clarity and variability. In this study, we investigated articulatory clarity through the vowel articulation index (VAI) and variability through vowel formant dispersion (VFD). Using a sentence reading task, we assessed 11 individuals pre and six months post tongue cancer surgery, alongside 11 sex- and age matched typical speakers. Our results show that while the VAI was significantly smaller post-surgery compared to pre-surgery, there was no significant difference between patients and typical speakers at either time point. Post-surgery, speakers had higher VFD values for /i/ compared to pre-surgery and typical speakers, signalling higher variability. Taken together, our results suggest that while articulatory clarity remained within typical ranges following surgery for tongue cancer for the speakers in our study, articulatory variability increased.

Bence Mark Halpern, Teja Rebernik, Thomas Tienkamp et al.

We present an articulatory synthesis framework for the synthesis and manipulation of oral cancer speech for clinical decision making and alleviation of patient stress. Objective and subjective evaluations demonstrate that the framework has acceptable naturalness and is worth further investigation. A subsequent subjective vowel and consonant identification experiment showed that the articulatory synthesis system can manipulate the articulatory trajectories so that the synthesised speech reproduces problems present in the ground truth oral cancer speech.