Seungho Choe

Samir Mitha, Seungho Choe, Pejman Jahbedar Maralani et al.

We propose a novel architecture called MLP-SRGAN, which is a single-dimension Super Resolution Generative Adversarial Network (SRGAN) that utilizes Multi-Layer Perceptron Mixers (MLP-Mixers) along with convolutional layers to upsample in the slice direction. MLP-SRGAN is trained and validated using high resolution (HR) FLAIR MRI from the MSSEG2 challenge dataset. The method was applied to three multicentre FLAIR datasets (CAIN, ADNI, CCNA) of images with low spatial resolution in the slice dimension to examine performance on held-out (unseen) clinical data. Upsampled results are compared to several state-of-the-art SR networks. For images with high resolution (HR) ground truths, peak-signal-to-noise-ratio (PSNR) and structural similarity index (SSIM) are used to measure upsampling performance. Several new structural, no-reference image quality metrics were proposed to quantify sharpness (edge strength), noise (entropy), and blurriness (low frequency information) in the absence of ground truths. Results show MLP-SRGAN results in sharper edges, less blurring, preserves more texture and fine-anatomical detail, with fewer parameters, faster training/evaluation time, and smaller model size than existing methods. Code for MLP-SRGAN training and inference, data generators, models and no-reference image quality metrics will be available at https://github.com/IAMLAB-Ryerson/MLP-SRGAN.

Marc Aubreville, Jonas Ammeling, Sweta Banerjee et al.

Automated mitosis detection is a well-established task in computational pathology. While previous benchmarks focused on scanner-induced domain shift, clinical "real-world" application requires models to be robust across the vast variance to be expected in the histological landscape. The MItosis DOmain Generalization (MIDOG) 2025 challenge was designed to evaluate algorithmic performance across unprecedented biological and contextual diversity. We curated a test dataset of 365 cases, encompassing 12 distinct human, canine and feline tumor types, digitized across multiple scanning platforms. Moving beyond hand-selected hotspots, the challenge required detection also in random tissue areas (representative of the whole slide detection situation) and challenging areas (areas rich in hard negatives). In the second track, we introduced the classification of atypical mitotic figures (AMFs). There were 18 teams submitting to the detection track, with F1 scores ranging up to 0.740. In the AMF detection track, we had 21 submissions with balanced accuracy values up to 0.908. Our analysis reveals that while most models perform reliably in traditional hotspots, significant performance degradation occurs in challenging ROIs, where false positive rates tripled. Furthermore, performance varied significantly across the 12 tumor types, highlighting "blind spots" in current state-of-the-art architectures when encountering rare or highly pleomorphic malignancies. Moreover, we evaluated the effectiveness of ensembling and found a mean increases of 1.5 and 1.3 percentage points in F1 score and balanced accuracy, respectively. In contrast, TTA showed no relevant improvement. MIDOG 2025 demonstrates that "in the wild" mitosis detection remains a significant hurdle. The transition from hotspot-only evaluation to a multi-contextual framework provides a more realistic proxy for clinical reliability.