Yao-Chih Lee

Yao-Chih Lee, Kuan-Wei Tseng, Guan-Sheng Chen et al.

Dense depth and pose estimation is a vital prerequisite for various video applications. Traditional solutions suffer from the robustness of sparse feature tracking and insufficient camera baselines in videos. Therefore, recent methods utilize learning-based optical flow and depth prior to estimate dense depth. However, previous works require heavy computation time or yield sub-optimal depth results. We present GCVD, a globally consistent method for learning-based video structure from motion (SfM) in this paper. GCVD integrates a compact pose graph into the CNN-based optimization to achieve globally consistent estimation from an effective keyframe selection mechanism. It can improve the robustness of learning-based methods with flow-guided keyframes and well-established depth prior. Experimental results show that GCVD outperforms the state-of-the-art methods on both depth and pose estimation. Besides, the runtime experiments reveal that it provides strong efficiency in both short- and long-term videos with global consistency provided.

Hau Chu, Jia-Hong Lee, Yao-Chih Lee et al.

This paper introduces an approach for multi-human 3D pose estimation and tracking based on calibrated multi-view. The main challenge lies in finding the cross-view and temporal correspondences correctly even when several human pose estimations are noisy. Compare to previous solutions that construct 3D poses from multiple views, our approach takes advantage of temporal consistency to match the 2D poses estimated with previously constructed 3D skeletons in every view. Therefore cross-view and temporal associations are accomplished simultaneously. Since the performance suffers from mistaken association and noisy predictions, we design two strategies for aiming better correspondences and 3D reconstruction. Specifically, we propose a part-aware measurement for 2D-3D association and a filter that can cope with 2D outliers during reconstruction. Our approach is efficient and effective comparing to state-of-the-art methods; it achieves competitive results on two benchmarks: 96.8% on Campus and 97.4% on Shelf. Moreover, we extends the length of Campus evaluation frames to be more challenging and our proposal also reach well-performed result.