M. Fritz

A. Azamnouri, M. Haug, L. Woltmann et al.

The integration of machine learning (ML) into complex software systems has increased challenges in collaboration and communication (CoCo) of the teams building these systems. ML engineering (MLE) teams often involve diverse roles, ML engineers, data scientists, software engineers, and domain experts, each bringing unique goals, experiences, and jargon. These interdisciplinary dynamics can make it challenging to deploy, reproduce, and maintain ML-enabled systems over the long term. Previous studies have uncovered several CoCo challenges and practices, but most have focused on software-centric companies, leaving limited empirical understanding of how these dynamics unfold in hardware-centric contexts. In hardware-centric environments, CoCo challenges are shaped by additional constraints such as strict data governance, long development cycles, and tight coupling with physical processes, which amplify coordination complexity and reduce flexibility. To strengthen empirical understanding in such settings, we present a qualitative investigation of MLE teams within a global semiconductor company, where ML-enabled systems and manufacturing processes introduce additional complexity. We interviewed 12 practitioners regarding CoCo practices, tools, challenges, and approaches. Through analysis, we identified 16 recurring challenges, with unclear roles and responsibilities emerging as the most critical, and common practices and recommendations practitioners considered effective in mitigating CoCo problems. While grounded in a single organizational context, our findings align with known issues in interdisciplinary ML-enabled systems development, but also demonstrate how these challenges manifest differently under hardware-driven constraints. Our results highlight directions for future research and tool support to strengthen CoCo in MLE projects and ensure the success of ML-enabled systems.

M. Wagner, H. Basevi, R. Shetty et al.

In-depth scene descriptions and question answering tasks have greatly increased the scope of today's definition of scene understanding. While such tasks are in principle open ended, current formulations primarily focus on describing only the current state of the scenes under consideration. In contrast, in this paper, we focus on the future states of the scenes which are also conditioned on actions. We posit this as a question answering task, where an answer has to be given about a future scene state, given observations of the current scene, and a question that includes a hypothetical action. Our solution is a hybrid model which integrates a physics engine into a question answering architecture in order to anticipate future scene states resulting from object-object interactions caused by an action. We demonstrate first results on this challenging new problem and compare to baselines, where we outperform fully data-driven end-to-end learning approaches.