Eva Tuba

Gjorgjina Cenikj, Jakub Kudela, Eva Tuba et al.

Algorithm Selection (AS) aims to automatically identify the most suitable optimization algorithm for a given problem instance by leveraging measurable problem characteristics and historical performance data. In this study, we investigate the generalization ability of AS models across both synthetic and real-world optimization landscapes. We consider two widely used academic benchmark suites (BBOB and CEC) and two real-world problem sets (robotics trajectory optimization tasks and unmanned aerial vehicle path-planning problems). Through a systematic cross-benchmark evaluation, we analyze how AS models transfer between domains, identify where generalization succeeds or breaks down, and highlight the challenges that arise when applying AS in realistic, domain-specific contexts. Our findings provide insights into the robustness of current AS approaches and inform the development of more reliable, broadly applicable AS systems for real-world optimization.

Sara Gjorgjieva, Eva Tuba, Barbara Koroušić Seljak et al.

Landscape feature representations play a central role in automated algorithm selection and meta-learning for black-box optimization, yet little is known about how different representations agree (or disagree) in the structures they impose on problem spaces. This paper presents a systematic unsupervised evaluation of four state-of-the-art representations (ELA, DeepELA, TransOptAS, and DoE2Vec) using a diverse set of affine combinations of BBOB functions (MA-BBOB). By applying extensive clustering analyses, coverage-based stability measures, and cross-representation similarity assessments, we show that each representation organizes the same problems in markedly different ways: ELA and TransOptAS form compact geometric structures, DeepELA provides a balanced intermediate view, and DoE2Vec achieves strong semantic alignment but with substantial fragmentation. Our results reveal that no single representation dominates; rather, they capture complementary aspects of the underlying landscapes. These findings highlight the importance of multi-view analyses for understanding representation behavior and offer guidance on selecting or combining representations in downstream meta-learning and algorithm selection tasks. In addition, across two different algorithm families (Differential Evolution and Particle Swarm Optimization), we show that landscape representations face an inherent trade-off in how well they align structural landscape descriptions with observed performance, indicating that no single representation can fully capture algorithm performance.

Sara Gjorgjieva, Eva Tuba, Tome Eftimov

In large-scale benchmarking of stochastic optimization algorithms, the key challenge is no longer whether repeated runs are needed for reliability, but how to determine when sufficient evidence has been collected without incurring unnecessary computational cost. We study a learning-based extension of a recent empirical online heuristic that adaptively estimates the required number of runs using outlier handling and skewness-based symmetry checks. Using annotated outcomes from 132{,}000 Nevergrad runs on COCO (24 problems in 20 dimensions, 10 instances each, 11 optimizers), we train classifiers on 23 statistical, energy-free, and shape and stability features to predict whether a run-number estimate is reliable, prioritizing detection of incorrect estimates via minority-class recall. We evaluate reliability prediction using a within-configuration learning setup, where models are trained and tested on data sharing the same optimizer. The results show that run-number reliability can be learned in a within-configuration scenario, enabling detection of unreliable estimates with high minority-class recall, although performance remains limited by the restricted data diversity within fixed configurations.

Christian L. Camacho-Villalón, Ana Nikolikj, Katharina Dost et al.

The PSO-X framework incorporates dozens of modules that have been proposed for solving single-objective continuous optimization problems using particle swarm optimization. While modular frameworks enable users to automatically generate and configure algorithms tailored to specific optimization problems, the complexity of this process increases with the number of modules in the framework and the degrees of freedom defined for their interaction. Understanding how modules affect the performance of algorithms for different problems is critical to making the process of finding effective implementations more efficient and identifying promising areas for further investigation. Despite their practical applications and scientific relevance, there is a lack of empirical studies investigating which modules matter most in modular optimization frameworks and how they interact. In this paper, we analyze the performance of 1424 particle swarm optimization algorithms instantiated from the PSO-X framework on the 25 functions in the CEC'05 benchmark suite with 10 and 30 dimensions. We use functional ANOVA to quantify the impact of modules and their combinations on performance in different problem classes. In practice, this allows us to identify which modules have greater influence on PSO-X performance depending on problem features such as multimodality, mathematical transformations and varying dimensionality. We then perform a cluster analysis to identify groups of problem classes that share similar module effect patterns. Our results show low variability in the importance of modules in all problem classes, suggesting that particle swarm optimization performance is driven by a few influential modules.

Adis Alihodžić, Eva Tuba, Milan Tuba

Modern smart grids rely on dense measurement infrastructures, communication links, and intelligent field devices. Although this improves supervision and control, it also increases vulnerability to cyber-physical disruptions. Operators must distinguish physical incidents, such as faults or line disturbances, from malicious actions, such as false data injection or unauthorized command execution. This chapter investigates this problem using the well-known MSU/ORNL Power System Attack Dataset. The proposed method combines machine learning with genetic-algorithm-based feature selection. The objective is twofold: to classify attack and natural events accurately, and to determine whether a reduced set of physically informative PMU/IED measurements can support reliable detection. Several baseline models are evaluated, including logistic regression, RBF-SVM, XGBoost, Random Forest, and Extra Trees. The results show that tree-based ensemble models are the most effective for the considered dataset, with Extra Trees providing the strongest full-feature baseline. After feature selection, the GA + Extra Trees model reduces the clean PMU feature space from 112 attributes to an average of 27.4 attributes over five runs, while increasing macro-F1 from 0.9118 to 0.9212 and ROC-AUC from 0.9791 to 0.9837. These results indicate that many synchronized electrical measurements are redundant. A compact subset of phasor-based features can still provide accurate and interpretable anomaly detection in smart grids.

Ana Nikolikj, Mario Andrés Muñoz, Eva Tuba et al.

This paper leverages the recently introduced concept of algorithm footprints to investigate the interplay between algorithm configurations and problem characteristics. Performance footprints are calculated for six modular variants of the CMA-ES algorithm (modCMA), evaluated on 24 benchmark problems from the BBOB suite, across two-dimensional settings: 5-dimensional and 30-dimensional. These footprints provide insights into why different configurations of the same algorithm exhibit varying performance and identify the problem features influencing these outcomes. Our analysis uncovers shared behavioral patterns across configurations due to common interactions with problem properties, as well as distinct behaviors on the same problem driven by differing problem features. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of algorithm footprints in enhancing interpretability and guiding configuration choices.

Luca Manzoni, Luca Mariot, Eva Tuba

The use of balanced crossover operators in Genetic Algorithms (GA) ensures that the binary strings generated as offsprings have the same Hamming weight of the parents, a constraint which is sought in certain discrete optimization problems. Although this method reduces the size of the search space, the resulting fitness landscape often becomes more difficult for the GA to explore and to discover optimal solutions. This issue has been studied in this paper by applying an adaptive bias strategy to a counter-based crossover operator that introduces unbalancedness in the offspring with a certain probability, which is decreased throughout the evolutionary process. Experiments show that improving the exploration of the search space with this adaptive bias strategy is beneficial for the GA performances in terms of the number of optimal solutions found for the balanced nonlinear Boolean functions problem.

Luca Manzoni, Luca Mariot, Eva Tuba

In several combinatorial optimization problems arising in cryptography and design theory, the admissible solutions must often satisfy a balancedness constraint, such as being represented by bitstrings with a fixed number of ones. For this reason, several works in the literature tackling these optimization problems with Genetic Algorithms (GA) introduced new balanced crossover operators which ensure that the offspring has the same balancedness characteristics of the parents. However, the use of such operators has never been thoroughly motivated, except for some generic considerations about search space reduction. In this paper, we undertake a rigorous statistical investigation on the effect of balanced and unbalanced crossover operators against three optimization problems from the area of cryptography and coding theory: nonlinear balanced Boolean functions, binary Orthogonal Arrays (OA) and bent functions. In particular, we consider three different balanced crossover operators (each with two variants: "left-to-right" and "shuffled"), two of which have never been published before, and compare their performances with classic one-point crossover. We are able to confirm that the balanced crossover operators performs better than all three balanced crossover operators. Furthermore, in two out of three crossovers, the "left-to-right" version performs better than the "shuffled" version.