1.5CVFeb 27
A multimodal slice discovery framework for systematic failure detection and explanation in medical image classificationYixuan Liu, Kanwal K. Bhatia, Ahmed E. Fetit
Despite advances in machine learning-based medical image classifiers, the safety and reliability of these systems remain major concerns in practical settings. Existing auditing approaches mainly rely on unimodal features or metadata-based subgroup analyses, which are limited in interpretability and often fail to capture hidden systematic failures. To address these limitations, we introduce the first automated auditing framework that extends slice discovery methods to multimodal representations specifically for medical applications. Comprehensive experiments were conducted under common failure scenarios using the MIMIC-CXR-JPG dataset, demonstrating the framework's strong capability in both failure discovery and explanation generation. Our results also show that multimodal information generally allows more comprehensive and effective auditing of classifiers, while unimodal variants beyond image-only inputs exhibit strong potential in scenarios where resources are constrained.
3.6IVJun 27, 2024
Robustness Testing of Black-Box Models Against CT Degradation Through Test-Time AugmentationJack Highton, Quok Zong Chong, Samuel Finestone et al.
Deep learning models for medical image segmentation and object detection are becoming increasingly available as clinical products. However, as details are rarely provided about the training data, models may unexpectedly fail when cases differ from those in the training distribution. An approach allowing potential users to independently test the robustness of a model, treating it as a black box and using only a few cases from their own site, is key for adoption. To address this, a method to test the robustness of these models against CT image quality variation is presented. In this work we present this framework by demonstrating that given the same training data, the model architecture and data pre processing greatly affect the robustness of several frequently used segmentation and object detection methods to simulated CT imaging artifacts and degradation. Our framework also addresses the concern about the sustainability of deep learning models in clinical use, by considering future shifts in image quality due to scanner deterioration or imaging protocol changes which are not reflected in a limited local test dataset.
8.7CVAug 6, 2021
Contrastive Learning for View Classification of EchocardiogramsAgisilaos Chartsias, Shan Gao, Angela Mumith et al.
Analysis of cardiac ultrasound images is commonly performed in routine clinical practice for quantification of cardiac function. Its increasing automation frequently employs deep learning networks that are trained to predict disease or detect image features. However, such models are extremely data-hungry and training requires labelling of many thousands of images by experienced clinicians. Here we propose the use of contrastive learning to mitigate the labelling bottleneck. We train view classification models for imbalanced cardiac ultrasound datasets and show improved performance for views/classes for which minimal labelled data is available. Compared to a naive baseline model, we achieve an improvement in F1 score of up to 26% in those views while maintaining state-of-the-art performance for the views with sufficiently many labelled training observations.
2.0IVJul 11, 2019
Disease classification of macular Optical Coherence Tomography scans using deep learning software: validation on independent, multi-centre dataKanwal K. Bhatia, Mark S. Graham, Louise Terry et al.
Purpose: To evaluate Pegasus-OCT, a clinical decision support software for the identification of features of retinal disease from macula OCT scans, across heterogenous populations involving varying patient demographics, device manufacturers, acquisition sites and operators. Methods: 5,588 normal and anomalous macular OCT volumes (162,721 B-scans), acquired at independent centres in five countries, were processed using the software. Results were evaluated against ground truth provided by the dataset owners. Results: Pegasus-OCT performed with AUROCs of at least 98% for all datasets in the detection of general macular anomalies. For scans of sufficient quality, the AUROCs for general AMD and DME detection were found to be at least 99% and 98%, respectively. Conclusions: The ability of a clinical decision support system to cater for different populations is key to its adoption. Pegasus-OCT was shown to be able to detect AMD, DME and general anomalies in OCT volumes acquired across multiple independent sites with high performance. Its use thus offers substantial promise, with the potential to alleviate the burden of growing demand in eye care services caused by retinal disease.