Helen C. Purchase

Yiheng Liang, Kim Marriott, Helen C. Purchase

The importance of replication is often discussed and advocated -- not only in the domains of visualization and HCI, but in all scientific areas. When replicating a study, design decisions need to be made with regards which aspects of the original study will remain the same and which will be altered. We present a supporting multi-dimensional design space framework within which such decisions can be identified, categorized, compared and analyzed. The framework treats replication experimental design as a pairwise comparison problem, and represents the design by four practical dimensions defined by three comparison levels. The design space is therefore a framework that can be used for both retrospective characterization and prospective planning. We provide worked examples, and relate our framework to other attempts at describing the scope of replication studies.

Vahan Yoghourdjian, Daniel Archambault, Stephan Diehl et al.

For decades, researchers in information visualisation and graph drawing have focused on developing techniques for the layout and display of very large and complex networks. Experiments involving human participants have also explored the readability of different styles of layout and representations for such networks. In both bodies of literature, networks are frequently referred to as being 'large' or 'complex', yet these terms are relative. From a human-centred, experiment point-of-view, what constitutes 'large' (for example) depends on several factors, such as data complexity, visual complexity, and the technology used. In this paper, we survey the literature on human-centred experiments to understand how, in practice, different features and characteristics of node-link diagrams affect visual complexity.