Grace Wang

Dingkun Zhou, Krish Patel, Ajay Kankipati et al.

Emotions conveyed through voice and face shape engagement and context in human AI interaction. Despite rapid progress in omni modal large language models, the holistic evaluation of emotional reasoning with audiovisual cues remains limited. To address this gap, we introduce AV EMO Reasoning, a benchmark designed to systematically assess emotional reasoning abilities in large language models. The framework uses a curated audiovisual corpus comprising synthetic single turn and multi turn dialogues and a real world subset, together with emotion perception and interaction reasoning metrics, to evaluate whether models can understand user emotions and produce appropriate responses. By releasing a systematic evaluation benchmark, AV EMO Reasoning offers a reproducible standard for evaluating emotion aware dialogue and advances toward more natural, adaptive human AI interaction.

10a Labs, Grace Cheong, Violet Davis et al.

AI agents are increasingly interacting within shared online environments, creating new operational security risks. We analyze activity on Moltbook, a Reddit-style social platform where AI agents--typically configured and overseen by human operators--post and interact with one another at scale. Using a dataset of 228,684 posts produced by more than 39,500 accounts over a seventeen-day observation window, we combine semantic clustering of high-engagement posts with LLM-assisted classification of harmful content and manual review of high-risk samples. The analysis identifies 98 thematic discourse clusters spanning agent infrastructure, autonomy debates, and financial activity. While most observed content was benign, 18.28% of posts contained toxic, manipulative, or malicious material. We cluster malicious content and identify 74 classes of malicious behavior, including credential harvesting attempts, host-execution instructions, proxy routing guidance, and efforts to install untrusted agent skills. Harmful content frequently appeared within mainstream operational discussions about agent functionality. We also document coordinated posting campaigns capable of generating thousands of posts in minutes.

Mahima Milinda Alwis Weerasinghe, David Parry, Grace Wang et al.

Artificial Spiking Neural Networks (ASNNs) promise greater information processing efficiency because of discrete event-based (i.e., spike) computation. Several Machine Learning (ML) applications use biologically inspired plasticity mechanisms as unsupervised learning techniques to increase the robustness of ASNNs while preserving efficiency. Spike Time Dependent Plasticity (STDP) and Intrinsic Plasticity (IP) (i.e., dynamic spiking threshold adaptation) are two such mechanisms that have been combined to form an ensemble learning method. However, it is not clear how this ensemble learning should be regulated based on spiking activity. Moreover, previous studies have attempted threshold based synaptic pruning following STDP, to increase inference efficiency at the cost of performance in ASNNs. However, this type of structural adaptation, that employs individual weight mechanisms, does not consider spiking activity for pruning which is a better representation of input stimuli. We envisaged that plasticity-based spike-regulation and spike-based pruning will result in ASSNs that perform better in low resource situations. In this paper, a novel ensemble learning method based on entropy and network activation is introduced, which is amalgamated with a spike-rate neuron pruning technique, operated exclusively using spiking activity. Two electroencephalography (EEG) datasets are used as the input for classification experiments with a three-layer feed forward ASNN trained using one-pass learning. During the learning process, we observed neurons assembling into a hierarchy of clusters based on spiking rate. It was discovered that pruning lower spike-rate neuron clusters resulted in increased generalization or a predictable decline in performance.

Paula Bergero, Laura P. Schaposnik, Grace Wang

A dramatic increase in the number of outbreaks of Dengue has recently been reported, and climate change is likely to extend the geographical spread of the disease. In this context, this paper shows how a neural network approach can incorporate Dengue and COVID-19 data as well as external factors (such as social behaviour or climate variables), to develop predictive models that could improve our knowledge and provide useful tools for health policy makers. Through the use of neural networks with different social and natural parameters, in this paper we define a Correlation Model through which we show that the number of cases of COVID-19 and Dengue have very similar trends. We then illustrate the relevance of our model by extending it to a Long short-term memory model (LSTM) that incorporates both diseases, and using this to estimate Dengue infections via COVID-19 data in countries that lack sufficient Dengue data.

Shardul Sapkota, Matthew Jörke, Zane Sabbagh et al.

Recent advances in user modeling make it feasible to conduct open-ended inference over a person's everyday computer use. Despite longstanding visions of systems that deeply understand our actions and the purposes they serve in our lives, existing systems only capture what a person is doing in the moment -- not why they are doing it -- limiting these systems to surface-level support. We introduce striving co-creation, a process for inferring broader life goals from unstructured observations of computer use. Grounded in Activity Theory and Emmons' personal strivings framework, our system progressively constructs a hierarchical representation of a person's activities. Crucially, strivings are difficult to fully resolve from observation alone, as the same action can be driven by many different goals. Our system therefore supports an editing interface that gives people agency over how they are understood by the system, feeding their corrections back into subsequent rounds of striving induction. In a week-long field deployment (N=14), we find that our co-creation process produces strivings that are representative of participants' long-term goals and gives them greater agency than baseline methods.

Shuhe Li, Chenxu Guo, Jiachen Lian et al.

Early evaluation of children's language is frustrated by the high pitch, long phones, and sparse data that derail automatic speech recognisers. We introduce K-Function, a unified framework that combines accurate sub-word transcription, objective scoring, and actionable feedback. Its core, Kids-WFST, merges a Wav2Vec2 phoneme encoder with a phoneme-similarity Dysfluent-WFST to capture child-specific errors while remaining fully interpretable. Kids-WFST attains 1.39% phoneme error on MyST and 8.61% on Multitudes--absolute gains of 10.47 and 7.06 points over a greedy-search decoder. These high-fidelity transcripts power an LLM that grades verbal skills, milestones, reading, and comprehension, aligning with human proctors and supplying tongue-and-lip visualizations plus targeted advice. The results show that precise phoneme recognition cements a complete diagnostic-feedback loop, paving the way for scalable, clinician-ready language assessment.

John Chen, Alexandros Lotsos, Lexie Zhao et al.

Inductive qualitative methods have been a mainstay of education research for decades, yet it takes much time and effort to conduct rigorously. Recent advances in artificial intelligence, particularly with generative AI (GAI), have led to initial success in generating inductive coding results. Like human coders, GAI tools rely on instructions to work, and how to instruct it may matter. To understand how ML/GAI approaches could contribute to qualitative coding processes, this study applied two known and two theory-informed novel approaches to an online community dataset and evaluated the resulting coding results. Our findings show significant discrepancies between ML/GAI approaches and demonstrate the advantage of our approaches, which introduce human coding processes into GAI prompts.

Karen Zhou, Alexander A. Meitus, Milo Chase et al.

Do American presidents speak discernibly different from each other? If so, in what ways? And are these differences confined to any single medium of communication? To investigate these questions, this paper introduces a novel metric of uniqueness based on large language models, develops a new lexicon for divisive speech, and presents a framework for assessing the distinctive ways in which presidents speak about their political opponents. Applying these tools to a variety of corpora of presidential speeches, we find considerable evidence that Donald Trump's speech patterns diverge from those of all major party nominees for the presidency in recent history. Trump is significantly more distinctive than his fellow Republicans, whose uniqueness values appear closer to those of the Democrats. Contributing to these differences is Trump's employment of divisive and antagonistic language, particularly when targeting his political opponents. These differences hold across a variety of measurement strategies, arise on both the campaign trail and in official presidential addresses, and do not appear to be an artifact of secular changes in presidential communications.

John Chen, Alexandros Lotsos, Grace Wang et al.

Open coding, a key inductive step in qualitative research, discovers and constructs concepts from human datasets. However, capturing extensive and nuanced aspects or "coding moments" can be challenging, especially with large discourse datasets. While some studies explore machine learning (ML)/Generative AI (GAI)'s potential for open coding, few evaluation studies exist. We compare open coding results by five recently published ML/GAI approaches and four human coders, using a dataset of online chat messages around a mobile learning software. Our systematic analysis reveals ML/GAI approaches' strengths and weaknesses, uncovering the complementary potential between humans and AI. Line-by-line AI approaches effectively identify content-based codes, while humans excel in interpreting conversational dynamics. We discussed how embedded analytical processes could shape the results of ML/GAI approaches. Instead of replacing humans in open coding, researchers should integrate AI with and according to their analytical processes, e.g., as parallel co-coders.