Mireia Crispin‐Ortuzar

William McGough, Thomas Buddenkotte, Stephan Ursprung et al.

This study introduces an automated pipeline for renal cancer (RC) detection in non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT). In the development of our pipeline, we test three detections models: a shape model, a 2D-, and a 3D axial-sample model. Training (n=1348) and testing (n=64) data were gathered from open sources (KiTS23, Abdomen1k, CT-ORG) and Cambridge University Hospital (CUH). Results from cross-validation and testing revealed that the 2D axial sample model had the highest small ($\leq$40mm diameter) RC detection area under the curve (AUC) of 0.804. Our pipeline achieves 61.9\% sensitivity and 92.7\% specificity for small kidney cancers on unseen test data. Our results are much more accurate than previous attempts to automatically detect small renal cancers in NCCT, the most likely imaging modality for RC screening. This pipeline offers a promising advance that may enable screening for kidney cancers.

Thomas Buddenkotte, Lorena Escudero Sanchez, Mireia Crispin-Ortuzar et al.

Uncertainty quantification in automated image analysis is highly desired in many applications. Typically, machine learning models in classification or segmentation are only developed to provide binary answers; however, quantifying the uncertainty of the models can play a critical role for example in active learning or machine human interaction. Uncertainty quantification is especially difficult when using deep learning-based models, which are the state-of-the-art in many imaging applications. The current uncertainty quantification approaches do not scale well in high-dimensional real-world problems. Scalable solutions often rely on classical techniques, such as dropout, during inference or training ensembles of identical models with different random seeds to obtain a posterior distribution. In this paper, we show that these approaches fail to approximate the classification probability. On the contrary, we propose a scalable and intuitive framework to calibrate ensembles of deep learning models to produce uncertainty quantification measurements that approximate the classification probability. On unseen test data, we demonstrate improved calibration, sensitivity (in two out of three cases) and precision when being compared with the standard approaches. We further motivate the usage of our method in active learning, creating pseudo-labels to learn from unlabeled images and human-machine collaboration.

Shuaike Shen, Ke Liu, Jiaqing Xie et al.

Foundation models for medical image segmentation struggle under out-of-distribution (OOD) shifts, often producing fragmented false positives on OOD tumors. We introduce R$^{2}$Seg, a training-free framework for robust OOD tumor segmentation that operates via a two-stage Reason-and-Reject process. First, the Reason step employs an LLM-guided anatomical reasoning planner to localize organ anchors and generate multi-scale ROIs. Second, the Reject step applies two-sample statistical testing to candidates generated by a frozen foundation model (BiomedParse) within these ROIs. This statistical rejection filter retains only candidates significantly different from normal tissue, effectively suppressing false positives. Our framework requires no parameter updates, making it compatible with zero-update test-time augmentation and avoiding catastrophic forgetting. On multi-center and multi-modal tumor segmentation benchmarks, R$^{2}$Seg substantially improves Dice, specificity, and sensitivity over strong baselines and the original foundation models. Code are available at https://github.com/Eurekashen/R2Seg.

Daniël Boeke, Cedrik Blommestijn, Rebecca N. Wray et al.

Recurrence risk estimation in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is essential for guiding postoperative surveillance and treatment. The Leibovich score remains widely used for stratifying distant recurrence risk but offers limited patient-level resolution and excludes imaging information. This study evaluates multimodal recurrence prediction by integrating preoperative computed tomography (CT) and postoperative histopathology whole-slide images (WSIs). A modular deep learning framework with pretrained encoders and Cox-based survival modeling was tested across unimodal, late fusion, and intermediate fusion setups. In a real-world ccRCC cohort, WSI-based models consistently outperformed CT-only models, underscoring the prognostic strength of pathology. Intermediate fusion further improved performance, with the best model (TITAN-CONCH with ResNet-18) approaching the adjusted Leibovich score. Random tie-breaking narrowed the gap between the clinical baseline and learned models, suggesting discretization may overstate individualized performance. Using simple embedding concatenation, radiology added value primarily through fusion. These findings demonstrate the feasibility of foundation model-based multimodal integration for personalized ccRCC risk prediction. Future work should explore more expressive fusion strategies, larger multimodal datasets, and general-purpose CT encoders to better match pathology modeling capacity.