Claus Weihs

ML
3papers
4citations
Novelty33%
AI Score17

3 Papers

CLMar 3, 2021
Combining Prediction and Interpretation in Decision Trees (PrInDT) -- a Linguistic Example

Claus Weihs, Sarah Buschfeld

In this paper, we show that conditional inference trees and ensembles are suitable methods for modeling linguistic variation. As against earlier linguistic applications, however, we claim that their suitability is strongly increased if we combine prediction and interpretation. To that end, we have developed a statistical method, PrInDT (Prediction and Interpretation with Decision Trees), which we introduce and discuss in the present paper.

MLOct 4, 2018
Infill Criterion for Multimodal Model-Based Optimisation

Dirk Surmann, Uwe Ligges, Claus Weihs

Physical systems are modelled and investigated within simulation software in an increasing range of applications. In reality an investigation of the system is often performed by empirical test scenarios which are related to typical situations. Our aim is to derive a method which generates diverse test scenarios each representing a challenging situation for the corresponding physical system. From a mathematical point of view challenging test scenarios correspond to local optima. Hence, we focus to identify all local optima within mathematical functions. Due to the fact that simulation runs are usually expensive we use the model-based optimisation approach with its well-known representative efficient global optimisation. We derive an infill criterion which focuses on the identification of local optima. The criterion is checked via fifteen different artificial functions in a computer experiment. Our new infill criterion performs better in identifying local optima compared to the expected improvement infill criterion and Latin Hypercube Samples.

MLFeb 10, 2016
Fast model selection by limiting SVM training times

Aydin Demircioglu, Daniel Horn, Tobias Glasmachers et al.

Kernelized Support Vector Machines (SVMs) are among the best performing supervised learning methods. But for optimal predictive performance, time-consuming parameter tuning is crucial, which impedes application. To tackle this problem, the classic model selection procedure based on grid-search and cross-validation was refined, e.g. by data subsampling and direct search heuristics. Here we focus on a different aspect, the stopping criterion for SVM training. We show that by limiting the training time given to the SVM solver during parameter tuning we can reduce model selection times by an order of magnitude.