Swapnil Gandhi

Swapnil Gandhi, Siva Hari, William J. Dally et al.

Recent methods expose intra-request parallelism in LLM outputs, allowing independent branches to decode concurrently. Existing serving systems execute these branches eagerly or under fixed caps. We show that both are brittle: eager admission inflates the shared decode step, degrading co-batched requests in serial stages, while conservative fixed caps forgo the throughput that motivated exposing branches in the first place. We call the excess step latency caused by admitted branches the branch externality and show that the safe width depends on batch composition, context lengths, and accumulated slack, all of which change continuously over a workload trace. We introduce TAPER, a per-step admission controller that treats extra branches as opportunistic work, admitted only when the predicted branch externality fits within the batch's current slack budget. Per-step regulation is practical because branch-level scheduling decouples compute from memory: branches share the request's prefix KV, so expanding or contracting width requires no memory reclamation. On Qwen3-32B, TAPER improves goodput by $1.77\times$ over IRP-Off and by $1.48\times$ over IRP-Eager, while maintaining over $95\%$ SLO attainment.

Athinagoras Skiadopoulos, Mark Zhao, Swapnil Gandhi et al.

Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models have become a widely-adopted solution to continue scaling model sizes without a corresponding linear increase in compute. During MoE model training, each input token is dynamically routed to a subset of experts -- sparsely-activated feed-forward networks -- within each transformer layer. The distribution of tokens assigned to each expert varies widely and rapidly over the course of training. To handle the wide load imbalance across experts, current systems are forced to either drop tokens assigned to popular experts, degrading convergence, or frequently rebalance resources allocated to each expert based on popularity, incurring high state migration overheads. To break this performance-accuracy tradeoff, we introduce SYMI, an adaptive MoE training system. The key insight of SYMI is to decouple the placement of expert parameters from their large optimizer state. SYMI statically partitions the optimizer of each expert across all training nodes. Meanwhile, SYMI dynamically adjusts the placement of expert parameters by repurposing existing weight updates, avoiding migration overheads. In doing so, SYMI right-sizes the GPU resources allocated to each expert, on a per-iteration basis, with minimal overhead. Compared to state-of-the-art MoE training systems, DeepSpeed and FlexMoE, SYMI is able to achieve a 30.5% and 25.9% faster time-to-convergence, respectively.