Loek Tonnaer

Luis A. Pérez Rey, Loek Tonnaer, Vlado Menkovski et al.

The definition of Linear Symmetry-Based Disentanglement (LSBD) proposed by (Higgins et al., 2018) outlines the properties that should characterize a disentangled representation that captures the symmetries of data. However, it is not clear how to measure the degree to which a data representation fulfills these properties. We propose a metric for the evaluation of the level of LSBD that a data representation achieves. We provide a practical method to evaluate this metric and use it to evaluate the disentanglement of the data representations obtained for three datasets with underlying $SO(2)$ symmetries.

Loek Tonnaer, Luis A. Pérez Rey, Vlado Menkovski et al.

The definition of Linear Symmetry-Based Disentanglement (LSBD) formalizes the notion of linearly disentangled representations, but there is currently no metric to quantify LSBD. Such a metric is crucial to evaluate LSBD methods and to compare to previous understandings of disentanglement. We propose $\mathcal{D}_\mathrm{LSBD}$, a mathematically sound metric to quantify LSBD, and provide a practical implementation for $\mathrm{SO}(2)$ groups. Furthermore, from this metric we derive LSBD-VAE, a semi-supervised method to learn LSBD representations. We demonstrate the utility of our metric by showing that (1) common VAE-based disentanglement methods don't learn LSBD representations, (2) LSBD-VAE as well as other recent methods can learn LSBD representations, needing only limited supervision on transformations, and (3) various desirable properties expressed by existing disentanglement metrics are also achieved by LSBD representations.

Nazly Rocio Santos Buitrago, Loek Tonnaer, Vlado Menkovski et al.

Many important data analysis applications present with severely imbalanced datasets with respect to the target variable. A typical example is medical image analysis, where positive samples are scarce, while performance is commonly estimated against the correct detection of these positive examples. We approach this challenge by formulating the problem as anomaly detection with generative models. We train a generative model without supervision on the `negative' (common) datapoints and use this model to estimate the likelihood of unseen data. A successful model allows us to detect the `positive' case as low likelihood datapoints. In this position paper, we present the use of state-of-the-art deep generative models (GAN and VAE) for the estimation of a likelihood of the data. Our results show that on the one hand both GANs and VAEs are able to separate the `positive' and `negative' samples in the MNIST case. On the other hand, for the NLST case, neither GANs nor VAEs were able to capture the complexity of the data and discriminate anomalies at the level that this task requires. These results show that even though there are a number of successes presented in the literature for using generative models in similar applications, there remain further challenges for broad successful implementation.