Halil Yetgin

NI
3papers
33citations
Novelty22%
AI Score19

3 Papers

NIDec 7, 2018Code
Machine Learning for Wireless Link Quality Estimation: A Survey

Gregor Cerar, Halil Yetgin, Mihael Mohorčič et al.

Since the emergence of wireless communication networks, a plethora of research papers focus their attention on the quality aspects of wireless links. The analysis of the rich body of existing literature on link quality estimation using models developed from data traces indicates that the techniques used for modeling link quality estimation are becoming increasingly sophisticated. A number of recent estimators leverage machine learning (ML) techniques that require a sophisticated design and development process, each of which has a great potential to significantly affect the overall model performance. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive survey on link quality estimators developed from empirical data and then focus on the subset that use ML algorithms. We analyze ML-based link quality estimation (LQE) models from two perspectives using performance data. Firstly, we focus on how they address quality requirements that are important from the perspective of the applications they serve. Secondly, we analyze how they approach the standard design steps commonly used in the ML community. Having analyzed the scientific body of the survey, we review existing open source datasets suitable for LQE research. Finally, we round up our survey with the lessons learned and design guidelines for ML-based LQE development and dataset collection.

LGFeb 23, 2021
Learning to Fairly Classify the Quality of Wireless Links

Gregor Cerar, Halil Yetgin, Mihael Mohorčič et al.

Machine learning (ML) has been used to develop increasingly accurate link quality estimators for wireless networks. However, more in-depth questions regarding the most suitable class of models, most suitable metrics and model performance on imbalanced datasets remain open. In this paper, we propose a new tree-based link quality classifier that meets high performance and fairly classifies the minority class and, at the same time, incurs low training cost. We compare the tree-based model, to a multilayer perceptron (MLP) non-linear model and two linear models, namely logistic regression (LR) and SVM, on a selected imbalanced dataset and evaluate their results using five different performance metrics. Our study shows that 1) non-linear models perform slightly better than linear models in general, 2) the proposed non-linear tree-based model yields the best performance trade-off considering F1, training time and fairness, 3) single metric aggregated evaluations based only on accuracy can hide poor, unfair performance especially on minority classes, and 4) it is possible to improve the performance on minority classes, by over 40% through feature selection and by over 20% through resampling, therefore leading to fairer classification results.

NIAug 12, 2020
Learning to Detect Anomalous Wireless Links in IoT Networks

Gregor Cerar, Halil Yetgin, Blaž Bertalanič et al.

After decades of research, the Internet of Things (IoT) is finally permeating real-life and helps improve the efficiency of infrastructures and processes as well as our health. As a massive number of IoT devices are deployed, they naturally incur great operational costs to ensure intended operations. To effectively handle such intended operations in massive IoT networks, automatic detection of malfunctioning, namely anomaly detection, becomes a critical but challenging task. In this paper, motivated by a real-world experimental IoT deployment, we introduce four types of wireless network anomalies that are identified at the link layer. We study the performance of threshold- and machine learning (ML)-based classifiers to automatically detect these anomalies. We examine the relative performance of three supervised and three unsupervised ML techniques on both non-encoded and encoded (autoencoder) feature representations. Our results demonstrate that; i) selected supervised approaches are able to detect anomalies with F1 scores of above 0.98, while unsupervised ones are also capable of detecting the said anomalies with F1 scores of, on average, 0.90, and ii) OC-SVM outperforms all the other unsupervised ML approaches reaching at F1 scores of 0.99 for SuddenD, 0.95 for SuddenR, 0.93 for InstaD and 0.95 for SlowD.