23.9IRMar 13
AMES: Approximate Multi-modal Enterprise Search via Late Interaction RetrievalTony Joseph, Carlos Pareja, David Lopes Pegna et al.
We present AMES (Approximate Multimodal Enterprise Search), a unified multimodal late interaction retrieval architecture which is backend agnostic. AMES demonstrates that fine-grained multimodal late interaction retrieval can be deployed within a production grade enterprise search engine without architectural redesign. Text tokens, image patches, and video frames are embedded into a shared representation space using multi-vector encoders, enabling cross-modal retrieval without modality specific retrieval logic. AMES employs a two-stage pipeline: parallel token level ANN search with per document Top-M MaxSim approximation, followed by accelerator optimized Exact MaxSim re-ranking. Experiments on the ViDoRe V3 benchmark show that AMES achieves competitive ranking performance within a scalable, production ready Solr based system.
4.0IRMay 14
The 99% Success Paradox: When Near-Perfect Retrieval Equals Random SelectionVyzantinos Repantis, Harshvardhan Singh, Tony Joseph et al.
For most of the history of information retrieval (IR), search results were designed for human consumers who could scan, filter, and discard irrelevant information on their own. This shaped retrieval systems to optimize for finding and ranking more relevant documents, but not keeping results clean and minimal, as the human was the final filter. However, LLMs have changed that by lacking this filtering ability. To address this, we introduce Bits-over-Random (BoR), a chance-corrected measure of retrieval selectivity that reveals when high success rates mask random-level performance. We measure selectivity as $BoR = \log_{2}\left(\frac{\mathrm{P}_{obs}}{\mathrm{P}_{rand}}\right)$, where $\mathrm{P}_{rand}$ is the hypergeometric baseline for the chosen success rule (here, coverage: $ \geq1 $ relevant in top-$K$). On the 20 Newsgroups dataset, BM25 and SPLADE both report $>99$% success at $K=100$ (coverage), yet $BoR \approx 0$, indicating random-level selectivity at that depth. When the expected coverage ratio $\left(\frac{K \cdot \bar{R}_{q}}{N}\right)$ exceeds 3-5, the baseline dominates and selectivity collapses. Downstream retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) evaluation confirms this pattern: LLM accuracy can degrade substantially at $K=100$, consistent with the near-zero BoR ceiling. In contrast, BoR remains positive on BEIR/SciFact and on MS MARCO (where 41 systems cluster within 0.2 bits of the theoretical ceiling despite a 13-point recall gap), confirming baseline predictions across sparse and large-scale settings. We further show that the collapse boundary applies to LLM agent tool selection, where small catalog sizes cause selectivity to vanish even with perfect selectors. These findings suggest reporting BoR alongside traditional metrics and reconsidering depth choices when additional retrieval provides negligible selectivity gains while inflating computational costs.
LGDec 10, 2020Code
Ensemble Squared: A Meta AutoML SystemJason Yoo, Tony Joseph, Dylan Yung et al.
There are currently many barriers that prevent non-experts from exploiting machine learning solutions ranging from the lack of intuition on statistical learning techniques to the trickiness of hyperparameter tuning. Such barriers have led to an explosion of interest in automated machine learning (AutoML), whereby an off-the-shelf system can take care of many of the steps for end-users without the need for expertise in machine learning. This paper presents Ensemble Squared (Ensemble$^2$), an AutoML system that ensembles the results of state-of-the-art open-source AutoML systems. Ensemble$^2$ exploits the diversity of existing AutoML systems by leveraging the differences in their model search space and heuristics. Empirically, we show that diversity of each AutoML system is sufficient to justify ensembling at the AutoML system level. In demonstrating this, we also establish new state-of-the-art AutoML results on the OpenML tabular classification benchmark.
CVJan 1, 2019Code
EdgeConnect: Generative Image Inpainting with Adversarial Edge LearningKamyar Nazeri, Eric Ng, Tony Joseph et al.
Over the last few years, deep learning techniques have yielded significant improvements in image inpainting. However, many of these techniques fail to reconstruct reasonable structures as they are commonly over-smoothed and/or blurry. This paper develops a new approach for image inpainting that does a better job of reproducing filled regions exhibiting fine details. We propose a two-stage adversarial model EdgeConnect that comprises of an edge generator followed by an image completion network. The edge generator hallucinates edges of the missing region (both regular and irregular) of the image, and the image completion network fills in the missing regions using hallucinated edges as a priori. We evaluate our model end-to-end over the publicly available datasets CelebA, Places2, and Paris StreetView, and show that it outperforms current state-of-the-art techniques quantitatively and qualitatively. Code and models available at: https://github.com/knazeri/edge-connect
CVJan 16, 2019
Joint Spatial and Layer Attention for Convolutional NetworksTony Joseph, Konstantinos G. Derpanis, Faisal Z. Qureshi
In this paper, we propose a novel approach that learns to sequentially attend to different Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) layers (i.e., ``what'' feature abstraction to attend to) and different spatial locations of the selected feature map (i.e., ``where'') to perform the task at hand. Specifically, at each Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) step, both a CNN layer and localized spatial region within it are selected for further processing. We demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach on two computer vision tasks: (i) image-based six degree of freedom camera pose regression and (ii) indoor scene classification. Empirically, we show that combining the ``what'' and ``where'' aspects of attention improves network performance on both tasks. We evaluate our method on standard benchmarks for camera localization (Cambridge, 7-Scenes, and TUM-LSI) and for scene classification (MIT-67 Indoor Scenes). For camera localization our approach reduces the median error by 18.8\% for position and 8.2\% for orientation (averaged over all scenes), and for scene classification it improves the mean accuracy by 3.4\% over previous methods.