CVSep 9, 2019
One-to-one Mapping for Unpaired Image-to-image TranslationZengming Shen, S. Kevin Zhou, Yifan Chen et al.
Recently image-to-image translation has attracted significant interests in the literature, starting from the successful use of the generative adversarial network (GAN), to the introduction of cyclic constraint, to extensions to multiple domains. However, in existing approaches, there is no guarantee that the mapping between two image domains is unique or one-to-one. Here we propose a self-inverse network learning approach for unpaired image-to-image translation. Building on top of CycleGAN, we learn a self-inverse function by simply augmenting the training samples by swapping inputs and outputs during training and with separated cycle consistency loss for each mapping direction. The outcome of such learning is a proven one-to-one mapping function. Our extensive experiments on a variety of datasets, including cross-modal medical image synthesis, object transfiguration, and semantic labeling, consistently demonstrate clear improvement over the CycleGAN method both qualitatively and quantitatively. Especially our proposed method reaches the state-of-the-art result on the cityscapes benchmark dataset for the label to photo unpaired directional image translation.
CVSep 9, 2019
Towards Learning a Self-inverse Network for Bidirectional Image-to-image TranslationZengming Shen, Yifan Chen, S. Kevin Zhou et al.
The one-to-one mapping is necessary for many bidirectional image-to-image translation applications, such as MRI image synthesis as MRI images are unique to the patient. State-of-the-art approaches for image synthesis from domain X to domain Y learn a convolutional neural network that meticulously maps between the domains. A different network is typically implemented to map along the opposite direction, from Y to X. In this paper, we explore the possibility of only wielding one network for bi-directional image synthesis. In other words, such an autonomous learning network implements a self-inverse function. A self-inverse network shares several distinct advantages: only one network instead of two, better generalization and more restricted parameter space. Most importantly, a self-inverse function guarantees a one-to-one mapping, a property that cannot be guaranteed by earlier approaches that are not self-inverse. The experiments on three datasets show that, compared with the baseline approaches that use two separate models for the image synthesis along two directions, our self-inverse network achieves better synthesis results in terms of standard metrics. Finally, our sensitivity analysis confirms the feasibility of learning a self-inverse function for the bidirectional image translation.
CVJan 13, 2019
The Liver Tumor Segmentation Benchmark (LiTS)Patrick Bilic, Patrick Christ, Hongwei Bran Li et al.
In this work, we report the set-up and results of the Liver Tumor Segmentation Benchmark (LiTS), which was organized in conjunction with the IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) 2017 and the International Conferences on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI) 2017 and 2018. The image dataset is diverse and contains primary and secondary tumors with varied sizes and appearances with various lesion-to-background levels (hyper-/hypo-dense), created in collaboration with seven hospitals and research institutions. Seventy-five submitted liver and liver tumor segmentation algorithms were trained on a set of 131 computed tomography (CT) volumes and were tested on 70 unseen test images acquired from different patients. We found that not a single algorithm performed best for both liver and liver tumors in the three events. The best liver segmentation algorithm achieved a Dice score of 0.963, whereas, for tumor segmentation, the best algorithms achieved Dices scores of 0.674 (ISBI 2017), 0.702 (MICCAI 2017), and 0.739 (MICCAI 2018). Retrospectively, we performed additional analysis on liver tumor detection and revealed that not all top-performing segmentation algorithms worked well for tumor detection. The best liver tumor detection method achieved a lesion-wise recall of 0.458 (ISBI 2017), 0.515 (MICCAI 2017), and 0.554 (MICCAI 2018), indicating the need for further research. LiTS remains an active benchmark and resource for research, e.g., contributing the liver-related segmentation tasks in \url{http://medicaldecathlon.com/}. In addition, both data and online evaluation are accessible via \url{www.lits-challenge.com}.