LGSep 1, 2021
Optimization Networks for Integrated Machine LearningMichael Kommenda, Johannes Karder, Andreas Beham et al.
Optimization networks are a new methodology for holistically solving interrelated problems that have been developed with combinatorial optimization problems in mind. In this contribution we revisit the core principles of optimization networks and demonstrate their suitability for solving machine learning problems. We use feature selection in combination with linear model creation as a benchmark application and compare the results of optimization networks to ordinary least squares with optional elastic net regularization. Based on this example we justify the advantages of optimization networks by adapting the network to solve other machine learning problems. Finally, optimization analysis is presented, where optimal input values of a system have to be found to achieve desired output values. Optimization analysis can be divided into three subproblems: model creation to describe the system, model selection to choose the most appropriate one and parameter optimization to obtain the input values. Therefore, optimization networks are an obvious choice for handling optimization analysis tasks.
LGSep 1, 2021
Complexity Measures for Multi-objective Symbolic RegressionMichael Kommenda, Andreas Beham, Michael Affenzeller et al.
Multi-objective symbolic regression has the advantage that while the accuracy of the learned models is maximized, the complexity is automatically adapted and need not be specified a-priori. The result of the optimization is not a single solution anymore, but a whole Pareto-front describing the trade-off between accuracy and complexity. In this contribution we study which complexity measures are most appropriately used in symbolic regression when performing multi- objective optimization with NSGA-II. Furthermore, we present a novel complexity measure that includes semantic information based on the function symbols occurring in the models and test its effects on several benchmark datasets. Results comparing multiple complexity measures are presented in terms of the achieved accuracy and model length to illustrate how the search direction of the algorithm is affected.
AIFeb 25, 2019
Resource-constrained multi-project scheduling with activity and time flexibilityViktoria A. Hauder, Andreas Beham, Sebastian Raggl et al.
Project scheduling in manufacturing environments often requires flexibility in terms of the selection and the exact length of alternative production activities. Moreover, the simultaneous scheduling of multiple lots is mandatory in many production planning applications. To meet these requirements, a new resource-constrained project scheduling problem (RCPSP) is introduced where both decisions (activity flexibility and time flexibility) are integrated. Besides the minimization of makespan, two new alternative objectives are presented: maximization of balanced length of selected activities (time balance) and maximization of balanced resource utilization (resource balance). New mixed integer and constraint programming (CP) models are proposed for the developed integrated flexible project scheduling problem. Benchmark instances on an already existing flexible RCPSP and the newly developed problem are solved to optimality. The real-world applicability of the suggested CP models is shown by additionally solving a large industry case.
NESep 23, 2013
On the Success Rate of Crossover Operators for Genetic Programming with Offspring SelectionGabriel Kronberger, Stephan Winkler, Michael Affenzeller et al.
Genetic programming is a powerful heuristic search technique that is used for a number of real world applications to solve among others regression, classification, and time-series forecasting problems. A lot of progress towards a theoretic description of genetic programming in form of schema theorems has been made, but the internal dynamics and success factors of genetic programming are still not fully understood. In particular, the effects of different crossover operators in combination with offspring selection are largely unknown. This contribution sheds light on the ability of well-known GP crossover operators to create better offspring when applied to benchmark problems. We conclude that standard (sub-tree swapping) crossover is a good default choice in combination with offspring selection, and that GP with offspring selection and random selection of crossover operators can improve the performance of the algorithm in terms of best solution quality when no solution size constraints are applied.