Sumeet Kumar Gupta

Akul Malhotra, Sumeet Kumar Gupta

Model compression via quantization and sparsity enhancement has gained an immense interest to enable the deployment of deep neural networks (DNNs) in resource-constrained edge environments. Although these techniques have shown promising results in reducing the energy, latency and memory requirements of the DNNs, their performance in non-ideal real-world settings (such as in the presence of hardware faults) is yet to be completely understood. In this paper, we investigate the impact of bit-flip and stuck-at faults on activation-sparse quantized DNNs (QDNNs). We show that a high level of activation sparsity comes at the cost of larger vulnerability to faults. For instance, activation-sparse QDNNs exhibit up to 17.32% lower accuracy than the standard QDNNs. We also establish that one of the major cause of the degraded accuracy is sharper minima in the loss landscape for activation-sparse QDNNs, which makes them more sensitive to perturbations in the weight values due to faults. Based on this observation, we propose the mitigation of the impact of faults by employing a sharpness-aware quantization (SAQ) training scheme. The activation-sparse and standard QDNNs trained with SAQ have up to 36.71% and 24.76% higher inference accuracy, respectively compared to their conventionally trained equivalents. Moreover, we show that SAQ-trained activation-sparse QDNNs show better accuracy in faulty settings than standard QDNNs trained conventionally. Thus the proposed technique can be instrumental in achieving sparsity-related energy/latency benefits without compromising on fault tolerance.

Jeffry Victor, Chunguang Wang, Sumeet K. Gupta

Crossbar memory arrays have been touted as the workhorse of in-memory computing (IMC)-based acceleration of Deep Neural Networks (DNNs), but the associated hardware non-idealities limit their efficacy. To address this, cross-layer design solutions that reduce the impact of hardware non-idealities on DNN accuracy are needed. In Part 1 of this paper, we established the co-optimization strategies for various memory technologies and their crossbar arrays, and conducted a comparative technology evaluation in the context of IMC robustness. In this part, we analyze various design knobs such as array size and bit-slice (number of bits per device) and their impact on the performance of 8T SRAM, ferroelectric transistor (FeFET), Resistive RAM (ReRAM) and spin-orbit-torque magnetic RAM (SOT-MRAM) in the context of inference accuracy at 7nm technology node. Further, we study the effect of circuit design solutions such as Partial Wordline Activation (PWA) and custom ADC reference levels that reduce the hardware non-idealities and comparatively analyze the response of each technology to such accuracy enhancing techniques. Our results on ResNet-20 (with CIFAR-10) show that PWA increases accuracy by up to 32.56% while custom ADC reference levels yield up to 31.62% accuracy enhancement. We observe that compared to the other technologies, FeFET, by virtue of its small layout height and high distinguishability of its memory states, is best suited for large arrays. For higher bit-slices and a more complex dataset (ResNet-50 with Cifar-100) we found that ReRAM matches the performance of FeFET.

Akul Malhotra, Sumeet Kumar Gupta

Improving the hardware efficiency of deep neural network (DNN) accelerators with techniques such as quantization and sparsity enhancement have shown an immense promise. However, their inference accuracy in non-ideal real-world settings (such as in the presence of hardware faults) is yet to be systematically analyzed. In this work, we investigate the impact of memory faults on activation-sparse quantized DNNs (AS QDNNs). We show that a high level of activation sparsity comes at the cost of larger vulnerability to faults, with AS QDNNs exhibiting up to 11.13% lower accuracy than the standard QDNNs. We establish that the degraded accuracy correlates with a sharper minima in the loss landscape for AS QDNNs, which makes them more sensitive to perturbations in the weight values due to faults. Based on this observation, we employ sharpness-aware quantization (SAQ) training to mitigate the impact of memory faults. The AS and standard QDNNs trained with SAQ have up to 19.50% and 15.82% higher inference accuracy, respectively compared to their conventionally trained equivalents. Moreover, we show that SAQ-trained AS QDNNs show higher accuracy in faulty settings than standard QDNNs trained conventionally. Thus, sharpness-aware training can be instrumental in achieving sparsity-related latency benefits without compromising on fault tolerance.

Shubham Jain, Sumeet Kumar Gupta, Anand Raghunathan

The use of lower precision has emerged as a popular technique to optimize the compute and storage requirements of complex Deep Neural Networks (DNNs). In the quest for lower precision, recent studies have shown that ternary DNNs (which represent weights and activations by signed ternary values) represent a promising sweet spot, achieving accuracy close to full-precision networks on complex tasks. We propose TiM-DNN, a programmable in-memory accelerator that is specifically designed to execute ternary DNNs. TiM-DNN supports various ternary representations including unweighted {-1,0,1}, symmetric weighted {-a,0,a}, and asymmetric weighted {-a,0,b} ternary systems. The building blocks of TiM-DNN are TiM tiles -- specialized memory arrays that perform massively parallel signed ternary vector-matrix multiplications with a single access. TiM tiles are in turn composed of Ternary Processing Cells (TPCs), bit-cells that function as both ternary storage units and signed ternary multiplication units. We evaluate an implementation of TiM-DNN in 32nm technology using an architectural simulator calibrated with SPICE simulations and RTL synthesis. We evaluate TiM-DNN across a suite of state-of-the-art DNN benchmarks including both deep convolutional and recurrent neural networks. A 32-tile instance of TiM-DNN achieves a peak performance of 114 TOPs/s, consumes 0.9W power, and occupies 1.96mm2 chip area, representing a 300X and 388X improvement in TOPS/W and TOPS/mm2, respectively, compared to an NVIDIA Tesla V100 GPU. In comparison to specialized DNN accelerators, TiM-DNN achieves 55X-240X and 160X-291X improvement in TOPS/W and TOPS/mm2, respectively. Finally, when compared to a well-optimized near-memory accelerator for ternary DNNs, TiM-DNN demonstrates 3.9x-4.7x improvement in system-level energy and 3.2x-4.2x speedup, underscoring the potential of in-memory computing for ternary DNNs.