Evgenya Romanenkova

Ekaterina Gurina, Nikita Klyuchnikov, Alexey Zaytsev et al.

We present a data-driven algorithm and mathematical model for anomaly alarming at directional drilling. The algorithm is based on machine learning. It compares the real-time drilling telemetry with one corresponding to past accidents and analyses the level of similarity. The model performs a time-series comparison using aggregated statistics and Gradient Boosting classification. It is trained on historical data containing the drilling telemetry of $80$ wells drilled within $19$ oilfields. The model can detect an anomaly and identify its type by comparing the real-time measurements while drilling with the ones from the database of past accidents. Validation tests show that our algorithm identifies half of the anomalies with about $0.53$ false alarms per day on average. The model performance ensures sufficient time and cost savings as it enables partial prevention of the failures and accidents at the well construction.

Evgenya Romanenkova, Alexey Zaytsev, Nikita Klyuchnikov et al.

During the directional drilling, a bit may sometimes go to a nonproductive rock layer due to the gap about 20m between the bit and high-fidelity rock type sensors. The only way to detect the lithotype changes in time is the usage of Measurements While Drilling (MWD) data. However, there are no general mathematical modeling approaches that both well reconstruct the rock type based on MWD data and correspond to specifics of the oil and gas industry. In this article, we present a data-driven procedure that utilizes MWD data for quick detection of changes in rock type. We propose the approach that combines traditional machine learning based on the solution of the rock type classification problem with change detection procedures rarely used before in the Oil\&Gas industry. The data come from a newly developed oilfield in the north of western Siberia. The results suggest that we can detect a significant part of changes in rock type reducing the change detection delay from $20$ to $1.8$ meters and the number of false-positive alarms from $43$ to $6$ per well.