Zhuojia Shen

Zhuojia Shen, Komail Dharsee, John Criswell

Remote code disclosure attacks threaten embedded systems as they allow attackers to steal intellectual property or to find reusable code for use in control-flow hijacking attacks. Execute-only memory (XOM) prevents remote code disclosures, but existing XOM solutions either require a memory management unit that is not available on ARM embedded systems or incur significant overhead. We present PicoXOM: a fast and novel XOM system for ARMv7-M and ARMv8-M devices which leverages ARM's Data Watchpoint and Tracing unit along with the processor's simplified memory protection hardware. On average, PicoXOM incurs 0.33% performance overhead and 5.89% code size overhead on two benchmark suites and five real-world applications.

Jie Zhou, Yufei Du, Zhuojia Shen et al.

Microcontroller-based embedded systems are increasingly used for applications that can have serious and immediate consequences if compromised---including automobile control systems, smart locks, drones, and implantable medical devices. Due to resource and execution-time constraints, C is the primary language used for programming these devices. Unfortunately, C is neither type-safe nor memory-safe, and control-flow hijacking remains a prevalent threat. This paper presents Silhouette: a compiler-based defense that efficiently guarantees the integrity of return addresses, significantly reducing the attack surface for control-flow hijacking. Silhouette combines an incorruptible shadow stack for return addresses with checks on forward control flow and memory protection to ensure that all functions return to the correct dynamic caller. To protect its shadow stack, Silhouette uses store hardening, an efficient intra-address space isolation technique targeting various ARM architectures that leverages special store instructions found on ARM processors. We implemented Silhouette for the ARMv7-M architecture, but our techniques are applicable to other common embedded ARM architectures. Our evaluation shows that Silhouette incurs a geometric mean of 1.3% and 3.4% performance overhead on two benchmark suites. Furthermore, we prototyped Silhouette-Invert, an alternative implementation of Silhouette, which incurs just 0.3% and 1.9% performance overhead, at the cost of a minor hardware change.

Zhuojia Shen, Jie Zhou, Divya Ojha et al.

Side-channel attacks such as Spectre that utilize speculative execution to steal application secrets pose a significant threat to modern computing systems. While program transformations can mitigate some Spectre attacks, more advanced attacks can divert control flow speculatively to bypass these protective instructions, rendering existing defenses useless. In this paper, we present Venkman: a system that employs program transformation to completely thwart Spectre attacks that poison entries in the Branch Target Buffer (BTB) and the Return Stack Buffer (RSB). Venkman transforms code so that all valid targets of a control-flow transfer have an identical alignment in the virtual address space; it further transforms all branches to ensure that all entries added to the BTB and RSB are properly aligned. By transforming all code this way, Venkman ensures that, in any program wanting Spectre defenses, all control-flow transfers, including speculative ones, do not skip over protective instructions Venkman adds to the code segment to mitigate Spectre attacks. Unlike existing defenses, Venkman does not reduce sharing of the BTB and RSB and does not flush these structures, allowing safe sharing and reuse among programs while maintaining strong protection against Spectre attacks. We built a prototype of Venkman on an IBM POWER8 machine. Our evaluation on the SPEC benchmarks and selected applications shows that Venkman increases execution time to 3.47$\times$ on average and increases code size to 1.94$\times$ on average when it is used to ensure that fences are executed to mitigate Spectre attacks. Our evaluation also shows that Spectre-resistant Software Fault Isolation (SFI) built using Venkman incurs a geometric mean of 2.42$\times$ space overhead and 1.68$\times$ performance overhead.