Dan Du

h-index2
2papers

2 Papers

CVJul 8, 2022Code
Learning High-quality Proposals for Acne Detection

Jianwei Zhang, Lei Zhang, Junyou Wang et al.

Acne detection is crucial for interpretative diagnosis and precise treatment of skin disease. The arbitrary boundary and small size of acne lesions lead to a significant number of poor-quality proposals in two-stage detection. In this paper, we propose a novel head structure for Region Proposal Network to improve the proposals' quality in two ways. At first, a Spatial Aware Double Head(SADH) structure is proposed to disentangle the representation learning for classification and localization from two different spatial perspectives. The proposed SADH ensures a steeper classification confidence gradient and suppresses the proposals having low intersection-over-union(IoU) with the matched ground truth. Then, we propose a Normalized Wasserstein Distance prediction branch to improve the correlation between the proposals' classification scores and IoUs. In addition, to facilitate further research on acne detection, we construct a new dataset named AcneSCU, with high-resolution imageries, precise annotations, and fine-grained lesion categories. Extensive experiments are conducted on both AcneSCU and the public dataset ACNE04, and the results demonstrate the proposed method could improve the proposals' quality, consistently outperforming state-of-the-art approaches. Code and the collected dataset are available in https://github.com/pingguokiller/acnedetection.

SEJun 30, 2025Code
QLPro: Automated Code Vulnerability Discovery via LLM and Static Code Analysis Integration

Junze Hu, Xiangyu Jin, Yizhe Zeng et al.

We introduce QLPro, a vulnerability detection framework that systematically integrates LLMs and static analysis tools to enable comprehensive vulnerability detection across entire open-source projects.We constructed a new dataset, JavaTest, comprising 10 open-source projects from GitHub with 62 confirmed vulnerabilities. CodeQL, a state-of-the-art static analysis tool, detected only 24 of these vulnerabilities while QLPro detected 41. Furthermore, QLPro discovered 6 previously unknown vulnerabilities, 2 of which have been confirmed as 0-days.