STMar 20
From Cross-Validation to SURE: Asymptotic Risk of Tuned Regularized EstimatorsKarun Adusumilli, Maximilian Kasy, Ashia Wilson
We derive the asymptotic risk function of regularized empirical risk minimization (ERM) estimators tuned by $n$-fold cross-validation (CV). The out-of-sample prediction loss of such estimators converges in distribution to the squared-error loss (risk function) of shrinkage estimators in the normal means model, tuned by Stein's unbiased risk estimate (SURE). This risk function provides a more fine-grained picture of predictive performance than uniform bounds on worst-case regret, which are common in learning theory: it quantifies how risk varies with the true parameter. As key intermediate steps, we show that (i) $n$-fold CV converges uniformly to SURE, and (ii) while SURE typically has multiple local minima, its global minimum is generically well separated. Well-separation ensures that uniform convergence of CV to SURE translates into convergence of the tuning parameter chosen by CV to that chosen by SURE.
EMDec 13, 2021
Risk and optimal policies in bandit experimentsKarun Adusumilli
We provide a decision theoretic analysis of bandit experiments under local asymptotics. Working within the framework of diffusion processes, we define suitable notions of asymptotic Bayes and minimax risk for these experiments. For normally distributed rewards, the minimal Bayes risk can be characterized as the solution to a second-order partial differential equation (PDE). Using a limit of experiments approach, we show that this PDE characterization also holds asymptotically under both parametric and non-parametric distributions of the rewards. The approach further describes the state variables it is asymptotically sufficient to restrict attention to, and thereby suggests a practical strategy for dimension reduction. The PDEs characterizing minimal Bayes risk can be solved efficiently using sparse matrix routines or Monte-Carlo methods. We derive the optimal Bayes and minimax policies from their numerical solutions. These optimal policies substantially dominate existing methods such as Thompson sampling; the risk of the latter is often twice as high.
EMApr 1, 2019
Dynamically Optimal Treatment AllocationKarun Adusumilli, Friedrich Geiecke, Claudio Schilter
Dynamic decisions are pivotal to economic policy making. We show how existing evidence from randomized control trials can be utilized to guide personalized decisions in challenging dynamic environments with budget and capacity constraints. Recent advances in reinforcement learning now enable the solution of many complex, real-world problems for the first time. We allow for restricted classes of policy functions and prove that their regret decays at rate n^(-0.5), the same as in the static case. Applying our methods to job training, we find that by exploiting the problem's dynamic structure, we achieve significantly higher welfare compared to static approaches.