Khavee Agustus Botangen

Khavee Agustus Botangen, Jian Yu, Michael Sheng

Adaptability is a significant property which enables software systems to continuously provide the required functionality and achieve optimal performance. The recognised importance of adaptability makes its evaluation an essential task. However, the various adaptability dimensions and implementation mechanisms make adaptive strategies difficult to evaluate. In service oriented computing, several frameworks that extend the WS-BPEL, the de facto standard in composing distributed business applications, focus on enabling the adaptability of processes. We aim to evaluate the adaptability of processes specified from the extended-BPEL frameworks. In this paper, we propose metrics to measure the adaptability of an AO4BPEL process. The metrics is grounded in the perspective that a process is capable of dynamically adapting to changes in business requirements. This opens potential future work on evaluating the adaptability of processes specified from various aspect-oriented WS-BPEL frameworks.

Khavee Agustus Botangen, Jian Yu, Sira Yongchareon et al.

Goal-oriented requirements variability modelling has established the understanding for adaptability in the early stage of software development-the Requirements Engineering phase. Goal-oriented requirements variability modelling considers both the intentions, which are captured as goals in goal models, and the preferences of different stakeholders as the main sources of system behaviour variability. Most often, however, intentions and preferences vary according to contexts. In this paper, we propose an approach for a contextual preference-based requirements variability analysis in the goal-oriented Requirements Engineering. We introduce a quantitative contextual preference specification to express the varying preferences imposed over requirements that are represented in the goal model. Such contextual preferences are used as criteria to evaluate alternative solutions that satisfy the requirements variability problem. We utilise a state-of-the-art reasoning implementation from the Answer Set Programming domain to automate the derivation and evaluation of solutions that fulfill the goals and satisfy the contextual preferences. Our approach will support systems analysts in their decisions upon alternative design solutions that define subsequent system implementations.