Vinu E. Venugopal

AI
h-index10
3papers
5citations
Novelty65%
AI Score45

3 Papers

4.6LGNov 18, 2022Code
TensAIR: Real-Time Training of Neural Networks from Data-streams

Mauro D. L. Tosi, Vinu E. Venugopal, Martin Theobald

Online learning (OL) from data streams is an emerging area of research that encompasses numerous challenges from stream processing, machine learning, and networking. Stream-processing platforms, such as Apache Kafka and Flink, have basic extensions for the training of Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) in a stream-processing pipeline. However, these extensions were not designed to train ANNs in real-time, and they suffer from performance and scalability issues when doing so. This paper presents TensAIR, the first OL system for training ANNs in real time. TensAIR achieves remarkable performance and scalability by using a decentralized and asynchronous architecture to train ANN models (either freshly initialized or pre-trained) via DASGD (decentralized and asynchronous stochastic gradient descent). We empirically demonstrate that TensAIR achieves a nearly linear scale-out performance in terms of (1) the number of worker nodes deployed in the network, and (2) the throughput at which the data batches arrive at the dataflow operators. We depict the versatility of TensAIR by investigating both sparse (word embedding) and dense (image classification) use cases, for which TensAIR achieved from 6 to 116 times higher sustainable throughput rates than state-of-the-art systems for training ANN in a stream-processing pipeline.

0.3CLDec 12, 2022
BigText-QA: Question Answering over a Large-Scale Hybrid Knowledge Graph

Jingjing Xu, Maria Biryukov, Martin Theobald et al.

Answering complex questions over textual resources remains a challenge, particularly when dealing with nuanced relationships between multiple entities expressed within natural-language sentences. To this end, curated knowledge bases (KBs) like YAGO, DBpedia, Freebase, and Wikidata have been widely used and gained great acceptance for question-answering (QA) applications in the past decade. While these KBs offer a structured knowledge representation, they lack the contextual diversity found in natural-language sources. To address this limitation, BigText-QA introduces an integrated QA approach, which is able to answer questions based on a more redundant form of a knowledge graph (KG) that organizes both structured and unstructured (i.e., "hybrid") knowledge in a unified graphical representation. Thereby, BigText-QA is able to combine the best of both worlds$\unicode{x2013}$a canonical set of named entities, mapped to a structured background KB (such as YAGO or Wikidata), as well as an open set of textual clauses providing highly diversified relational paraphrases with rich context information. Our experimental results demonstrate that BigText-QA outperforms DrQA, a neural-network-based QA system, and achieves competitive results to QUEST, a graph-based unsupervised QA system.

5.0AIMay 12
A CAP-like Trilemma for Large Language Models: Correctness, Non-bias, and Utility under Semantic Underdetermination

Vinu Ellampallil Venugopal

The CAP theorem states that a distributed system cannot simultaneously guarantee consistency, availability, and partition tolerance under network partition. Inspired by this result, this paper formulates a CAP-like conjecture for Large Language Models (LLMs). The proposed trilemma states that, under semantic underdetermination, an LLM cannot always simultaneously guarantee strong correctness, strict non-bias, and high utility. A prompt is semantically underdetermined when the given premises do not determine a unique answer. In such cases, a useful and decisive response requires the model to introduce a selection criterion, preference, prior, or value ordering. If this criterion is not supplied by the user or justified by the available premises, the response becomes biased in a broad selection-theoretic sense. Conversely, if the model avoids unsupported preferences, it may preserve correctness and non-bias but may reduce utility through refusal, hedging, or clarification. The paper formalizes this correctness--non-bias--utility trilemma, develops examples, and argues that certain LLM failures arise not merely from model limitations but from the structure of underdetermined decision requests.