Amar Kaur

Anh Bui, Trang Vu, Trung Le et al.

In this paper, we investigate the semantic collapsing problem in generative personalization, an under-explored topic where the learned visual concept ($V$) gradually shifts from its original textual meaning and comes to dominate other concepts in multi-concept input prompts. This issue not only reduces the semantic richness of complex input prompts like "a photo of $V$ wearing glasses and playing guitar" into simpler, less contextually rich forms such as "a photo of $V$" but also leads to simplified output images that fail to capture the intended concept. We identify the root cause as unconstrained optimisation, which allows the learned embedding $V$ to drift arbitrarily in the embedding space, both in direction and magnitude. To address this, we propose a simple yet effective training-free method that adjusts the magnitude and direction of pre-trained embedding at inference time, effectively mitigating the semantic collapsing problem. Our method is broadly applicable across different personalization methods and demonstrates significant improvements in text-image alignment in diverse use cases. Our code is anonymously published at https://github.com/tuananhbui89/Embedding-Adjustment

Manh Luong, Tamas Abraham, Junae Kim et al.

Existing multimodal safety benchmarks focus solely on visual inputs and cannot assess Omni Large Language Models (LLMs) that process vision, audio, and text. We introduce MCBench, a benchmark with 1196 scenarios spanning four safety categories that require integrating multiple modalities for accurate safety assessment. Each unsafe scenario is paired with a minimally different safe counterpart to assess model sensitivity. Our evaluations of state-of-the-art models reveal significant challenges. Omni LLMs struggle with subtle or non-physical risks but perform better when salient visual or acoustic cues are present. Analysis of reasoning traces shows that, although models can extract modality-specific information, they often fail to integrate these cues effectively for safety judgments. Our findings reveal that current Omni LLMs lack robust cross-modal reasoning in safety-critical settings, underscoring the need for improved architectures and training strategies for multimodal safety.