CYMar 24, 2021
Human Factors in Security Research: Lessons Learned from 2008-2018Mannat Kaur, Michel van Eeten, Marijn Janssen et al.
Instead of only considering technology, computer security research now strives to also take into account the human factor by studying regular users and, to a lesser extent, experts like operators and developers of systems. We focus our analysis on the research on the crucial population of experts, whose human errors can impact many systems at once, and compare it to research on regular users. To understand how far we advanced in the area of human factors, how the field can further mature, and to provide a point of reference for researchers new to this field, we analyzed the past decade of human factors research in security and privacy, identifying 557 relevant publications. Of these, we found 48 publications focused on expert users and analyzed all in depth. For additional insights, we compare them to a stratified sample of 48 end-user studies. In this paper we investigate: (i) The perspective on human factors, and how we can learn from safety science (ii) How and who are the participants recruited, and how this -- as we find -- creates a western-centric perspective (iii) Research objectives, and how to align these with the chosen research methods (iv) How theories can be used to increase rigor in the communities scientific work, including limitations to the use of Grounded Theory, which is often incompletely applied (v) How researchers handle ethical implications, and what we can do to account for them more consistently Although our literature review has limitations, new insights were revealed and avenues for further research identified.
NIJun 23, 2020
Classifying Network Vendors at Internet ScaleJordan Holland, Ross Teixeira, Paul Schmitt et al.
In this paper, we develop a method to create a large, labeled dataset of visible network device vendors across the Internet by mapping network-visible IP addresses to device vendors. We use Internet-wide scanning, banner grabs of network-visible devices across the IPv4 address space, and clustering techniques to assign labels to more than 160,000 devices. We subsequently probe these devices and use features extracted from the responses to train a classifier that can accurately classify device vendors. Finally, we demonstrate how this method can be used to understand broader trends across the Internet by predicting device vendors in traceroutes from CAIDA's Archipelago measurement system and subsequently examining vendor distributions across these traceroutes.
NIJul 18, 2019
Comparing the Effects of DNS, DoT, and DoH on Web PerformanceAustin Hounsel, Kevin Borgolte, Paul Schmitt et al.
Nearly every service on the Internet relies on the Domain Name System (DNS), which translates a human-readable name to an IP address before two endpoints can communicate. Today, DNS traffic is unencrypted, leaving users vulnerable to eavesdropping and tampering. Past work has demonstrated that DNS queries can reveal a user's browsing history and even what smart devices they are using at home. In response to these privacy concerns, two new protocols have been proposed: DNS-over-HTTPS (DoH) and DNS-over-TLS (DoT). Instead of sending DNS queries and responses in the clear, DoH and DoT establish encrypted connections between users and resolvers. By doing so, these protocols provide privacy and security guarantees that traditional DNS (Do53) lacks. In this paper, we measure the effect of Do53, DoT, and DoH on query response times and page load times from five global vantage points. We find that although DoH and DoT response times are generally higher than Do53, both protocols can perform better than Do53 in terms of page load times. However, as throughput decreases and substantial packet loss and latency are introduced, web pages load fastest with Do53. Additionally, web pages successfully load more often with Do53 and DoT than DoH. Based on these results, we provide several recommendations to improve DNS performance, such as opportunistic partial responses and wire format caching.