CVDec 15, 2021
Reliable Multi-Object Tracking in the Presence of Unreliable DetectionsTravis Mandel, Mark Jimenez, Emily Risley et al.
Recent multi-object tracking (MOT) systems have leveraged highly accurate object detectors; however, training such detectors requires large amounts of labeled data. Although such data is widely available for humans and vehicles, it is significantly more scarce for other animal species. We present Robust Confidence Tracking (RCT), an algorithm designed to maintain robust performance even when detection quality is poor. In contrast to prior methods which discard detection confidence information, RCT takes a fundamentally different approach, relying on the exact detection confidence values to initialize tracks, extend tracks, and filter tracks. In particular, RCT is able to minimize identity switches by efficiently using low-confidence detections (along with a single object tracker) to keep continuous track of objects. To evaluate trackers in the presence of unreliable detections, we present a challenging real-world underwater fish tracking dataset, FISHTRAC. In an evaluation on FISHTRAC as well as the UA-DETRAC dataset, we find that RCT outperforms other algorithms when provided with imperfect detections, including state-of-the-art deep single and multi-object trackers as well as more classic approaches. Specifically, RCT has the best average HOTA across methods that successfully return results for all sequences, and has significantly less identity switches than other methods.
HCJul 9, 2019
Let's Keep It Safe: Designing User Interfaces that Allow Everyone to Contribute to AI SafetyTravis Mandel, Jahnu Best, Randall H. Tanaka et al.
When AI systems are granted the agency to take impactful actions in the real world, there is an inherent risk that these systems behave in ways that are harmful. Typically, humans specify constraints on the AI system to prevent harmful behavior; however, very little work has studied how best to facilitate this difficult constraint specification process. In this paper, we study how to design user interfaces that make this process more effective and accessible, allowing people with a diversity of backgrounds and levels of expertise to contribute to this task. We first present a task design in which workers evaluate the safety of individual state-action pairs, and propose several variants of this task with improved task design and filtering mechanisms. Although this first design is easy to understand, it scales poorly to large state spaces. Therefore, we develop a new user interface that allows workers to write constraint rules without any programming. Despite its simplicity, we show that our rule construction interface retains full expressiveness. We present experiments utilizing crowdworkers to help address an important real-world AI safety problem in the domain of education. Our results indicate that our novel worker filtering and explanation methods outperform baseline approaches, and our rule-based interface allows workers to be much more efficient while improving data quality.