Robert Schweller

Divya Bajaj, Bin Fu, Ryan Knobel et al.

Chemical Reaction Networks (CRNs) are a well-established model of distributed computing characterized by quantities of molecular species that can transform or change through applications of reactions. A fundamental problem in CRNs is the reachability problem, which asks if an initial configuration of species can transition to a target configuration through an applicable sequence of reactions. It is well-known that the reachability problem in general CRNs was recently proven to be Ackermann-complete. However, if the CRN's reactions are restricted in both power, such as only deleting species (deletion-only rules) or consuming and producing an equal number of species (volume-preserving rules), and size (unimolecular or bimolecular rules), then reachability falls below Ackermann-completeness, and is even solvable in polynomial time for deletion-only systems. In this paper, we investigate reachability under this set of restricted unimolecular and bimolecular reactions, but in the Priority-Inhibitory CRN and Inhibitory CRN models. These models extend a traditional CRN by allowing some reactions to be inhibited from firing in a configuration if certain species are present; the exact inhibition behavior varies between the models. We first show that reachability with Priority iCRNs mostly remains in P for deletion-only systems, but becomes NP-complete for one case. We then show that reachability with deletion-only reactions for iCRNs is mostly NP-complete, and PSPACE-complete even for (1,1)-size (general) reactions. We also provide FPT algorithms for solving most of the reachability problems for the iCRN model. Finally, we show reachability for CRNs with states is already NP-hard for the simplest deletion-only systems, and is PSPACE-complete even for (general) (1,1)-size reactions.

Angel A. Cantu, Austin Luchsinger, Robert Schweller et al.

Traditionally, computation within self-assembly models is hard to conceal because the self-assembly process generates a crystalline assembly whose computational history is inherently part of the structure itself. With no way to remove information from the computation, this computational model offers a unique problem: how can computational input and computation be hidden while still computing and reporting the final output? Designing such systems is inherently motivated by privacy concerns in biomedical computing and applications in cryptography. In this paper we propose the problem of performing ``covert computation'' within tile self-assembly that seeks to design self-assembly systems that ``conceal'' both the input and computational history of performed computations. We achieve these results within the growth-only restricted abstract Tile Assembly Model (aTAM) with positive and negative interactions. We show that general-case covert computation is possible by implementing a set of basic covert logic gates capable of simulating any circuit (functionally complete). To further motivate the study of covert computation, we apply our new framework to resolve an outstanding complexity question; we use our covert circuitry to show that the unique assembly verification problem within the growth-only aTAM with negative interactions is coNP-complete.