Yuxin Cui

Yuang Peng, Yuxin Cui, Haomiao Tang et al.

Personalized image generation holds great promise in assisting humans in everyday work and life due to its impressive ability to creatively generate personalized content across various contexts. However, current evaluations either are automated but misalign with humans or require human evaluations that are time-consuming and expensive. In this work, we present DreamBench++, a human-aligned benchmark that advanced multimodal GPT models automate. Specifically, we systematically design the prompts to let GPT be both human-aligned and self-aligned, empowered with task reinforcement. Further, we construct a comprehensive dataset comprising diverse images and prompts. By benchmarking 7 modern generative models, we demonstrate that DreamBench++ results in significantly more human-aligned evaluation, helping boost the community with innovative findings.

Guiying Zhang, Yuxin Cui, Yong Zhao et al.

State-of-the-art face recognition algorithms are able to achieve good performance when sufficient training images are provided. Unfortunately, the number of facial images is limited in some real face recognition applications. In this paper, we propose ComplexFace, a novel and effective algorithm for face recognition with limited samples using complex number based data augmentation. The algorithm first generates new representations from original samples and then fuse both into complex numbers, which avoids the difficulty of weight setting in other fusion approaches. A test sample can then be expressed by the linear combination of all the training samples, which mapped the sample to the new representation space for classification by the kernel function. The collaborative representation based classifier is then built to make predictions. Extensive experiments on the Georgia Tech (GT) face database and the ORL face database show that our algorithm significantly outperforms existing methods: the average errors of previous approaches ranging from 31.66% to 41.75% are reduced to 14.54% over the GT database; the average errors of previous approaches ranging from 5.21% to 10.99% are reduced to 1.67% over the ORL database. In other words, our algorithm has decreased the average errors by up to 84.80% on the ORL database.