Ping Cai

Ping Cai, Xingyuan Chen, Peng Jin et al.

The purpose of unconditional text generation is to train a model with real sentences, then generate novel sentences of the same quality and diversity as the training data. However, when different metrics are used for comparing the methods of unconditional text generation, contradictory conclusions are drawn. The difficulty is that both the diversity and quality of the sample should be considered simultaneously when the models are evaluated. To solve this problem, a novel metric of distributional discrepancy (DD) is designed to evaluate generators based on the discrepancy between the generated and real training sentences. However, it cannot compute the DD directly because the distribution of real sentences is unavailable. Thus, we propose a method for estimating the DD by training a neural-network-based text classifier. For comparison, three existing metrics, bi-lingual evaluation understudy (BLEU) versus self-BLEU, language model score versus reverse language model score, and Fréchet embedding distance, along with the proposed DD, are used to evaluate two popular generative models of long short-term memory and generative pretrained transformer 2 on both syntactic and real data. Experimental results show that DD is significantly better than the three existing metrics for ranking these generative models.

Xingyuan Chen, Ping Cai, Peng Jin et al.

The autoregressive language model (ALM) trained with maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) is widely used in unconditional text generation. Due to exposure bias, the generated texts still suffer from low quality and diversity. This presents statistically as a discrepancy between the real text and generated text. Some research shows a discriminator can detect this discrepancy. Because the discriminator can encode more information than the generator, discriminator has the potentiality to improve generator. To alleviate the exposure bias, generative adversarial networks (GAN) use the discriminator to update the generator's parameters directly, but they fail by being evaluated precisely. A critical reason for the failure is the difference between the discriminator input and the ALM input. We propose a novel mechanism by adding a filter which has the same input as the discriminator. First, discriminator detects the discrepancy signals and passes to filter directly (or by learning). Then, we use the filter to reject some generated samples with a sampling-based method. Thus, the original generative distribution is revised to reduce the discrepancy. Two ALMs, RNN-based and Transformer-based, are experimented. Evaluated precisely by three metrics, our mechanism consistently outperforms the ALMs and all kinds of GANs across two benchmark data sets.

Xingyuan Chen, Ping Cai, Peng Jin et al.

The text generated by neural language models is not as good as the real text. This means that their distributions are different. Generative Adversarial Nets (GAN) are used to alleviate it. However, some researchers argue that GAN variants do not work at all. When both sample quality (such as Bleu) and sample diversity (such as self-Bleu) are taken into account, the GAN variants even are worse than a well-adjusted language model. But, Bleu and self-Bleu can not precisely measure this distributional discrepancy. In fact, how to measure the distributional discrepancy between real text and generated text is still an open problem. In this paper, we theoretically propose two metric functions to measure the distributional difference between real text and generated text. Besides that, a method is put forward to estimate them. First, we evaluate language model with these two functions and find the difference is huge. Then, we try several methods to use the detected discrepancy signal to improve the generator. However the difference becomes even bigger than before. Experimenting on two existing language GANs, the distributional discrepancy between real text and generated text increases with more adversarial learning rounds. It demonstrates both of these language GANs fail.