Mikhail Lisovsky

Jerry Wei, Arief Suriawinata, Bing Ren et al.

With the rise of deep learning, there has been increased interest in using neural networks for histopathology image analysis, a field that investigates the properties of biopsy or resected specimens traditionally manually examined under a microscope by pathologists. However, challenges such as limited data, costly annotation, and processing high-resolution and variable-size images make it difficult to quickly iterate over model designs. Throughout scientific history, many significant research directions have leveraged small-scale experimental setups as petri dishes to efficiently evaluate exploratory ideas. In this paper, we introduce a minimalist histopathology image analysis dataset (MHIST), an analogous petri dish for histopathology image analysis. MHIST is a binary classification dataset of 3,152 fixed-size images of colorectal polyps, each with a gold-standard label determined by the majority vote of seven board-certified gastrointestinal pathologists and annotator agreement level. MHIST occupies less than 400 MB of disk space, and a ResNet-18 baseline can be trained to convergence on MHIST in just 6 minutes using 3.5 GB of memory on a NVIDIA RTX 3090. As example use cases, we use MHIST to study natural questions such as how dataset size, network depth, transfer learning, and high-disagreement examples affect model performance. By introducing MHIST, we hope to not only help facilitate the work of current histopathology imaging researchers, but also make the field more-accessible to the general community. Our dataset is available at https://bmirds.github.io/MHIST.

Jerry Wei, Arief Suriawinata, Bing Ren et al.

Applying curriculum learning requires both a range of difficulty in data and a method for determining the difficulty of examples. In many tasks, however, satisfying these requirements can be a formidable challenge. In this paper, we contend that histopathology image classification is a compelling use case for curriculum learning. Based on the nature of histopathology images, a range of difficulty inherently exists among examples, and, since medical datasets are often labeled by multiple annotators, annotator agreement can be used as a natural proxy for the difficulty of a given example. Hence, we propose a simple curriculum learning method that trains on progressively-harder images as determined by annotator agreement. We evaluate our hypothesis on the challenging and clinically-important task of colorectal polyp classification. Whereas vanilla training achieves an AUC of 83.7% for this task, a model trained with our proposed curriculum learning approach achieves an AUC of 88.2%, an improvement of 4.5%. Our work aims to inspire researchers to think more creatively and rigorously when choosing contexts for applying curriculum learning.

Jason W. Wei, Arief A. Suriawinata, Louis J. Vaickus et al.

Histological classification of colorectal polyps plays a critical role in both screening for colorectal cancer and care of affected patients. An accurate and automated algorithm for the classification of colorectal polyps on digitized histopathology slides could benefit clinicians and patients. Evaluate the performance and assess the generalizability of a deep neural network for colorectal polyp classification on histopathology slide images using a multi-institutional dataset. In this study, we developed a deep neural network for classification of four major colorectal polyp types, tubular adenoma, tubulovillous/villous adenoma, hyperplastic polyp, and sessile serrated adenoma, based on digitized histopathology slides from our institution, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center (DHMC), in New Hampshire. We evaluated the deep neural network on an internal dataset of 157 histopathology slide images from DHMC, as well as on an external dataset of 238 histopathology slide images from 24 different institutions spanning 13 states in the United States. We measured accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of our model in this evaluation and compared its performance to local pathologists' diagnoses at the point-of-care retrieved from corresponding pathology laboratories. For the internal evaluation, the deep neural network had a mean accuracy of 93.5% (95% CI 89.6%-97.4%), compared with local pathologists' accuracy of 91.4% (95% CI 87.0%-95.8%). On the external test set, the deep neural network achieved an accuracy of 87.0% (95% CI 82.7%-91.3%), comparable with local pathologists' accuracy of 86.6% (95% CI 82.3%-90.9%). If confirmed in clinical settings, our model could assist pathologists by improving the diagnostic efficiency, reproducibility, and accuracy of colorectal cancer screenings.