Ephrem Wu

Seokjin Go, Marko Scrbak, Ephrem Wu et al.

In distributed Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) inference, input-dependent token routing interacts with GPU performance variability to create persistent stragglers under synchronized execution, where the slowest GPU determines layer latency. This performance variability is inherent to modern accelerators: manufacturing variation, power limits, and thermal conditions introduce measurable execution-time differences across nominally identical GPUs. The core challenge is that MoE execution-time imbalance arises from the interaction of workload skew and hardware asymmetry. Token routing produces uneven and layer-varying expert loads, while GPU throughput depends on device-specific operating characteristics and workload intensity. Prior work mitigates routing skew but assumes homogeneous hardware, optimizing token balance rather than execution latency. As a result, even balanced token assignments can leave hardware-induced stragglers unaddressed. Thus, we propose Variability-Informed Binning of Experts (ViBE), a hardware-aware expert placement framework that minimizes execution-time imbalance across GPUs. ViBE combines per-GPU performance modeling with expert activation profiling to assign high-load experts to faster devices and low-load experts to slower ones, reducing layer-level stragglers without modifying model semantics or hardware. Because both workload characteristics and effective GPU throughput can shift across serving conditions, ViBE supports lightweight recalibration under workload/performance drift to refresh its routing and performance estimates when needed. Results show that ViBE consistently reduces execution-time imbalance and improves SLO attainment by 14%, while lowering P90 TTFT by up to 45%. We further show that the impact of hardware variability increases at scale, making variability-aware placement important for efficient, high-utilization LLM serving.

Ephrem Wu

We describe a method for training accurate Transformer machine-translation models to run inference using 8-bit integer (INT8) hardware matrix multipliers, as opposed to the more costly single-precision floating-point (FP32) hardware. Unlike previous work, which converted only 85 Transformer matrix multiplications to INT8, leaving 48 out of 133 of them in FP32 because of unacceptable accuracy loss, we convert them all to INT8 without compromising accuracy. Tested on the newstest2014 English-to-German translation task, our INT8 Transformer Base and Transformer Big models yield BLEU scores that are 99.3% to 100% relative to those of the corresponding FP32 models. Our approach converts all matrix-multiplication tensors from an existing FP32 model into INT8 tensors by automatically making range-precision trade-offs during training. To demonstrate the robustness of this approach, we also include results from INT6 Transformer models.

Vijay Janapa Reddi, Christine Cheng, David Kanter et al.

Machine-learning (ML) hardware and software system demand is burgeoning. Driven by ML applications, the number of different ML inference systems has exploded. Over 100 organizations are building ML inference chips, and the systems that incorporate existing models span at least three orders of magnitude in power consumption and five orders of magnitude in performance; they range from embedded devices to data-center solutions. Fueling the hardware are a dozen or more software frameworks and libraries. The myriad combinations of ML hardware and ML software make assessing ML-system performance in an architecture-neutral, representative, and reproducible manner challenging. There is a clear need for industry-wide standard ML benchmarking and evaluation criteria. MLPerf Inference answers that call. In this paper, we present our benchmarking method for evaluating ML inference systems. Driven by more than 30 organizations as well as more than 200 ML engineers and practitioners, MLPerf prescribes a set of rules and best practices to ensure comparability across systems with wildly differing architectures. The first call for submissions garnered more than 600 reproducible inference-performance measurements from 14 organizations, representing over 30 systems that showcase a wide range of capabilities. The submissions attest to the benchmark's flexibility and adaptability.

Xiaoyu Yu, Yuwei Wang, Jie Miao et al.

Intensive computation is entering data centers with multiple workloads of deep learning. To balance the compute efficiency, performance, and total cost of ownership (TCO), the use of a field-programmable gate array (FPGA) with reconfigurable logic provides an acceptable acceleration capacity and is compatible with diverse computation-sensitive tasks in the cloud. In this paper, we develop an FPGA acceleration platform that leverages a unified framework architecture for general-purpose convolutional neural network (CNN) inference acceleration at a data center. To overcome the computation bound, 4,096 DSPs are assembled and shaped as supertile units (SUs) for different types of convolution, which provide up to 4.2 TOP/s 16-bit fixed-point performance at 500 MHz. The interleaved-task-dispatching method is proposed to map the computation across the SUs, and the memory bound is solved by a dispatching-assembling buffering model and broadcast caches. For various non-convolution operators, a filter processing unit is designed for general-purpose filter-like/pointwise operators. In the experiment, the performances of CNN models running on server-class CPUs, a GPU, and an FPGA are compared. The results show that our design achieves the best FPGA peak performance and a throughput at the same level as that of the state-of-the-art GPU in data centers, with more than 50 times lower latency.