Tim S. Lyon

Thomas Feller, Tim S. Lyon, Piotr Ostropolski-Nalewaja et al.

In our pursuit of generic criteria for decidable ontology-based querying, we introduce 'finite-cliquewidth sets' (FCS) of existential rules, a model-theoretically defined class of rule sets, inspired by the cliquewidth measure from graph theory. By a generic argument, we show that FCS ensures decidability of entailment for a sizable class of queries (dubbed 'DaMSOQs') subsuming conjunctive queries (CQs). The FCS class properly generalizes the class of finite-expansion sets (FES), and for signatures of arity at most 2, the class of bounded-treewidth sets (BTS). For higher arities, BTS is only indirectly subsumed by FCS by means of reification. Despite the generality of FCS, we provide a rule set with decidable CQ entailment (by virtue of first-order-rewritability) that falls outside FCS, thus demonstrating the incomparability of FCS and the class of finite-unification sets (FUS). In spite of this, we show that if we restrict ourselves to single-headed rule sets over signatures of arity at most 2, then FCS subsumes FUS.

Thomas Feller, Tim S. Lyon, Piotr Ostropolski-Nalewaja et al.

We propose a generic framework for establishing the decidability of a wide range of logical entailment problems (briefly called querying), based on the existence of countermodels that are structurally simple, gauged by certain types of width measures (with treewidth and cliquewidth as popular examples). As an important special case of our framework, we identify logics exhibiting width-finite finitely universal model sets, warranting decidable entailment for a wide range of homomorphism-closed queries, subsuming a diverse set of practically relevant query languages. As a particularly powerful width measure, we propose to employ Blumensath's partitionwidth, which subsumes various other commonly considered width measures and exhibits highly favorable computational and structural properties. Focusing on the formalism of existential rules as a popular showcase, we explain how finite partitionwidth sets of rules subsume other known abstract decidable classes but - leveraging existing notions of stratification - also cover a wide range of new rulesets. We expose natural limitations for fitting the class of finite unification sets into our picture and suggest several options for remedy.

Tim S. Lyon, Sebastian Rudolph

This paper establishes alternative characterizations of very expressive classes of existential rule sets with decidable query entailment. We consider the notable class of greedy bounded-treewidth sets (gbts) and a new, generalized variant, called weakly gbts (wgbts). Revisiting and building on the notion of derivation graphs, we define (weakly) cycle-free derivation graph sets ((w)cdgs) and employ elaborate proof-theoretic arguments to obtain that gbts and cdgs coincide, as do wgbts and wcdgs. These novel characterizations advance our analytic proof-theoretic understanding of existential rules and will likely be instrumental in practice.

Kees van Berkel, Tim S. Lyon

STIT logic is a prominent framework for the analysis of multi-agent choice-making. In the available deontic extensions of STIT, the principle of Ought-implies-Can (OiC) fulfills a central role. However, in the philosophical literature a variety of alternative OiC interpretations have been proposed and discussed. This paper provides a modular framework for deontic STIT that accounts for a multitude of OiC readings. In particular, we discuss, compare, and formalize ten such readings. We provide sound and complete sequent-style calculi for all of the various STIT logics accommodating these OiC principles. We formally analyze the resulting logics and discuss how the different OiC principles are logically related. In particular, we propose an endorsement principle describing which OiC readings logically commit one to other OiC readings.

Nicola Gigante, Lucia {Gomez Alvarez}, Tim S. Lyon

Many complex scenarios require the coordination of agents possessing unique points of view and distinct semantic commitments. In response, standpoint logic (SL) was introduced in the context of knowledge integration, allowing one to reason with diverse and potentially conflicting viewpoints by means of indexed modalities. Another multi-modal logic of import is linear temporal logic (LTL) - a formalism used to express temporal properties of systems and processes, having prominence in formal methods and fields related to artificial intelligence. In this paper, we present standpoint linear temporal logic (SLTL), a new logic that combines the temporal features of LTL with the multi-perspective modelling capacity of SL. We define the logic SLTL, its syntax, and its semantics, establish its decidability and complexity, and provide a terminating tableau calculus to automate SLTL reasoning. Conveniently, this offers a clear path to extend existing LTL reasoners with practical reasoning support for temporal reasoning in multi-perspective settings.

Tim S. Lyon, Lucía Gómez Álvarez

Standpoint logic is a recently proposed formalism in the context of knowledge integration, which advocates a multi-perspective approach permitting reasoning with a selection of diverse and possibly conflicting standpoints rather than forcing their unification. In this paper, we introduce nested sequent calculi for propositional standpoint logics--proof systems that manipulate trees whose nodes are multisets of formulae--and show how to automate standpoint reasoning by means of non-deterministic proof-search algorithms. To obtain worst-case complexity-optimal proof-search, we introduce a novel technique in the context of nested sequents, referred to as "coloring," which consists of taking a formula as input, guessing a certain coloring of its subformulae, and then running proof-search in a nested sequent calculus on the colored input. Our technique lets us decide the validity of standpoint formulae in CoNP since proof-search only produces a partial proof relative to each permitted coloring of the input. We show how all partial proofs can be fused together to construct a complete proof when the input is valid, and how certain partial proofs can be transformed into a counter-model when the input is invalid. These "certificates" (i.e. proofs and counter-models) serve as explanations of the (in)validity of the input.

Tim S. Lyon, Lukas Zenger

We introduce and investigate non-wellfounded and cyclic linear nested sequent calculi, and, as a case study, develop such systems for linear temporal logic (LTL). The paper addresses two central problems, which we call 'cycle recognition' and 'unraveling.' Cycle recognition concerns identifying cycles in non-wellfounded proofs in order to extract corresponding cyclic proofs, while unraveling studies the converse transformation, from cyclic proofs to non-wellfounded ones. Although these processes are well understood for Gentzen sequents, they have received little attention for more expressive sequent formalisms and become more challenging in the linear nested sequent setting. To address cycle recognition, we show the completeness of non-wellfounded proofs relative to a particular normal form exhibiting a property we call 'saturation recurrence,' which enables the systematic extraction of cyclic proofs. To address unraveling, we introduce a specialized procedure that shifts rule applications forward along linear nested sequents, allowing non-wellfounded proofs to be reconstructed from cyclic ones. Overall, our work provides new proof-theoretic techniques for cycle recognition and unraveling in expressive multisequent formalisms.

Tim S. Lyon, Omar Taher

We answer a question posed by Poggiolesi concerning a syntactic decidability proof for GL in the tree-hypersequent system CSGL, and resolve a challenge identified by Maggesi and Perini Brogi, who sought a PSPACE proof-search algorithm for GL in expressive sequent-based formalisms. We work with a notational variant of CSGL formulated in terms of (labeled) tree sequents. Our answer is complexity-optimal: we present a proof-search algorithm that decides the (in)validity of formulae and runs in PSPACE, matching the known PSPACE-completeness of GL. To achieve this, we introduce a "linearization method," which constructs only a single branch of a derivation and of a tree sequent at a time, avoiding the exponential blowup typical of naive proof-search in sequent formalisms. We show how to systematically combine fragments of tree sequents generated during proof-search to extract finite counter-models, which serves as a theoretical device for establishing the correctness of the algorithm when proof-search fails. Finally, we show that every valid formula admits a proof consisting solely of line sequents, which correspond to linear nested sequents. This establishes a connection between depth-first proof-search and linear nested sequent calculi. Our results not only answer the aforementioned questions, but also provide new insights into proof-search and correctness arguments in tree sequent systems for modal logics.

Tim S. Lyon, Piotr Ostropolski-Nalewaja

Chase algorithms are indispensable in the domain of knowledge base querying, which enable the extraction of implicit knowledge from a given database via applications of rules from a given ontology. Such algorithms have proved beneficial in identifying logical languages which admit decidable query entailment. Within the discipline of proof theory, sequent calculi have been used to write and design proof-search algorithms to identify decidable classes of logics. In this paper, we show that the chase mechanism in the context of existential rules is in essence the same as proof-search in an extension of Gentzen's sequent calculus for first-order logic. Moreover, we show that proof-search generates universal models of knowledge bases, a feature also exhibited by the chase. Thus, we formally connect a central tool for establishing decidability proof-theoretically with a central decidability tool in the context of knowledge representation.

Tim Lyon, Jonas Karge

We introduce a framework that allows for the construction of sequent systems for expressive description logics extending ALC. Our framework not only covers a wide array of common description logics, but also allows for sequent systems to be obtained for extensions of description logics with special formulae that we call "role relational axioms." All sequent systems are sound, complete, and possess favorable properties such as height-preserving admissibility of common structural rules and height-preserving invertibility of rules.

Tim S. Lyon

This paper develops a novel nested sequent proof-search methodology for intuitionistic tense logics (ITLs), supporting finite counter-model extraction. We introduce a new loop-checking method that detects repeating nested sequents using homomorphisms, thereby bounding the height of derivations during proof-search. Due to the non-invertibility of some inference rules, the algorithm does not construct a single derivation, but a generalized structure we call a 'computation tree.' We show how proofs and counter-models can be extracted from computation trees when proof-search succeeds or fails, respectively. This establishes the finite model property for each ITL of the form IKt + A with A a subset of {T,B,D}.

Tim S. Lyon, Eugenio Orlandelli

We introduce cut-free nested sequent systems for a broad class of quantified modal logics (QMLs). The QMLs we consider are semantically defined using relational models that assign both an inner and outer domain to each world. This rich model structure enables the specification of various QMLs by enforcing different frame conditions, including increasing, decreasing, constant, and empty domains, as well as general path conditions and seriality. We extend the usual notion of nested sequent to include signatures, i.e., multisets of terms, which let us naturally define rules capturing the aforementioned domain conditions. A distinctive feature of our nested sequent systems is the use of reachability rules--inference rules parameterized by formal grammars (viz., semi-Thue systems). These rules operate by propagating or consuming formulae or terms along certain paths within a nested sequent, where paths are encoded as strings generated by a parameterizing grammar. This paper is the first to provide sound and complete nested systems for QMLs semantically characterized by models using both inner and outer domains. We analyze the proof-theoretic properties of these systems, identify a number of admissible structural rules, establish the invertibility of all rules, and prove a non-trivial syntactic cut-elimination theorem. We also observe that the standard universal quantifier rule used in nested systems subsumes the Extended Barcan Rule, which forces nested systems to capture QMLs with constant outer domains.

Tim Lyon

This thesis introduces the "method of structural refinement", which serves as a means of transforming the relational semantics of a modal and/or constructive logic into an 'economical' proof system by connecting two proof-theoretic paradigms: labelled and nested sequent calculi. The formalism of labelled sequents has been successful in that cut-free calculi in possession of desirable proof-theoretic properties can be automatically generated for large classes of logics. Despite these qualities, labelled systems make use of a complicated syntax that explicitly incorporates the semantics of the associated logic, and such systems typically violate the subformula property to a high degree. By contrast, nested sequent calculi employ a simpler syntax and adhere to a strict reading of the subformula property, making such systems useful in the design of automated reasoning algorithms. However, the downside of the nested sequent paradigm is that a general theory concerning the automated construction of such calculi (as in the labelled setting) is essentially absent, meaning that the construction of nested systems and the confirmation of their properties is usually done on a case-by-case basis. The refinement method connects both paradigms in a fruitful way, by transforming labelled systems into nested (or, refined labelled) systems with the properties of the former preserved throughout the transformation process. To demonstrate the method of refinement and some of its applications, we consider grammar logics, first-order intuitionistic logics, and deontic STIT logics. The introduced refined labelled calculi will be used to provide the first proof-search algorithms for deontic STIT logics. Furthermore, we employ our refined labelled calculi for grammar logics to show that every logic in the class possesses the effective Lyndon interpolation property.

Kees van Berkel, Tim Lyon

This paper is an appendix to the paper "Cut-free Calculi and Relational Semantics for Temporal STIT logics" by Berkel and Lyon, 2019. It provides the completeness proof for the basic STIT logic Ldm (relative to irreflexive, temporal Kripke STIT frames) as well as gives the derivation of the independence of agents axiom for the logic Xstit.