Marcin B. Tomczak

Marcin B. Tomczak, Sergio Valcarcel Macua, Enrique Munoz de Cote et al.

Recent policy optimization approaches have achieved substantial empirical success by constructing surrogate optimization objectives. The Approximate Policy Iteration objective (Schulman et al., 2015a; Kakade and Langford, 2002) has become a standard optimization target for reinforcement learning problems. Using this objective in practice requires an estimator of the advantage function. Policy optimization methods such as those proposed in Schulman et al. (2015b) estimate the advantages using a parametric critic. In this work we establish conditions under which the parametric approximation of the critic does not introduce bias to the updates of surrogate objective. These results hold for a general class of parametric policies, including deep neural networks. We obtain a result analogous to the compatible features derived for the original Policy Gradient Theorem (Sutton et al., 1999). As a result, we also identify a previously unknown bias that current state-of-the-art policy optimization algorithms (Schulman et al., 2015a, 2017) have introduced by not employing these compatible features.

Marcin B. Tomczak, Dongho Kim, Peter Vrancx et al.

Recent policy optimization approaches (Schulman et al., 2015a; 2017) have achieved substantial empirical successes by constructing new proxy optimization objectives. These proxy objectives allow stable and low variance policy learning, but require small policy updates to ensure that the proxy objective remains an accurate approximation of the target policy value. In this paper we derive an alternative objective that obtains the value of the target policy by applying importance sampling (IS). However, the basic importance sampled objective is not suitable for policy optimization, as it incurs too high variance in policy updates. We therefore introduce an approximation that allows us to directly trade-off the bias of approximation with the variance in policy updates. We show that our approximation unifies previously developed approaches and allows us to interpolate between them. We develop a practical algorithm by optimizing the introduced objective with proximal policy optimization techniques (Schulman et al., 2017). We also provide a theoretical analysis of the introduced policy optimization objective demonstrating bias-variance trade-off. We empirically demonstrate that the resulting algorithm improves upon state of the art on-policy policy optimization on continuous control benchmarks.