1.2BMMar 28, 2022
Multi-View Substructure Learning for Drug-Drug Interaction PredictionZimeng Li, Shichao Zhu, Bin Shao et al.
Drug-drug interaction (DDI) prediction provides a drug combination strategy for systemically effective treatment. Previous studies usually model drug information constrained on a single view such as the drug itself, leading to incomplete and noisy information, which limits the accuracy of DDI prediction. In this work, we propose a novel multi- view drug substructure network for DDI prediction (MSN-DDI), which learns chemical substructures from both the representations of the single drug (intra-view) and the drug pair (inter-view) simultaneously and utilizes the substructures to update the drug representation iteratively. Comprehensive evaluations demonstrate that MSN-DDI has almost solved DDI prediction for existing drugs by achieving a relatively improved accuracy of 19.32% and an over 99% accuracy under the transductive setting. More importantly, MSN-DDI exhibits better generalization ability to unseen drugs with a relatively improved accuracy of 7.07% under more challenging inductive scenarios. Finally, MSN-DDI improves prediction performance for real-world DDI applications to new drugs.
3.3LGNov 23, 2022
An ensemble of VisNet, Transformer-M, and pretraining models for molecular property prediction in OGB Large-Scale Challenge @ NeurIPS 2022Yusong Wang, Shaoning Li, Zun Wang et al.
In the technical report, we provide our solution for OGB-LSC 2022 Graph Regression Task. The target of this task is to predict the quantum chemical property, HOMO-LUMO gap for a given molecule on PCQM4Mv2 dataset. In the competition, we designed two kinds of models: Transformer-M-ViSNet which is an geometry-enhanced graph neural network for fully connected molecular graphs and Pretrained-3D-ViSNet which is a pretrained ViSNet by distilling geomeotric information from optimized structures. With an ensemble of 22 models, ViSNet Team achieved the MAE of 0.0723 eV on the test-challenge set, dramatically reducing the error by 39.75% compared with the best method in the last year competition.
15.0LGMar 14, 2024
Self-Consistency Training for Density-Functional-Theory Hamiltonian PredictionHe Zhang, Chang Liu, Zun Wang et al.
Predicting the mean-field Hamiltonian matrix in density functional theory is a fundamental formulation to leverage machine learning for solving molecular science problems. Yet, its applicability is limited by insufficient labeled data for training. In this work, we highlight that Hamiltonian prediction possesses a self-consistency principle, based on which we propose self-consistency training, an exact training method that does not require labeled data. It distinguishes the task from predicting other molecular properties by the following benefits: (1) it enables the model to be trained on a large amount of unlabeled data, hence addresses the data scarcity challenge and enhances generalization; (2) it is more efficient than running DFT to generate labels for supervised training, since it amortizes DFT calculation over a set of queries. We empirically demonstrate the better generalization in data-scarce and out-of-distribution scenarios, and the better efficiency over DFT labeling. These benefits push forward the applicability of Hamiltonian prediction to an ever-larger scale.
31.7CRMay 8, 2020
Defending Model Inversion and Membership Inference Attacks via Prediction PurificationZiqi Yang, Bin Shao, Bohan Xuan et al.
Neural networks are susceptible to data inference attacks such as the model inversion attack and the membership inference attack, where the attacker could infer the reconstruction and the membership of a data sample from the confidence scores predicted by the target classifier. In this paper, we propose a unified approach, namely purification framework, to defend data inference attacks. It purifies the confidence score vectors predicted by the target classifier by reducing their dispersion. The purifier can be further specialized in defending a particular attack via adversarial learning. We evaluate our approach on benchmark datasets and classifiers. We show that when the purifier is dedicated to one attack, it naturally defends the other one, which empirically demonstrates the connection between the two attacks. The purifier can effectively defend both attacks. For example, it can reduce the membership inference accuracy by up to 15% and increase the model inversion error by a factor of up to 4. Besides, it incurs less than 0.4% classification accuracy drop and less than 5.5% distortion to the confidence scores.