Xiaoming Kang

Zehao Lin, Shaobo Cui, Guodun Li et al.

Different people have different habits of describing their intents in conversations. Some people tend to deliberate their intents in several successive utterances, i.e., they use several consistent messages for readability instead of a long sentence to express their question. This creates a predicament faced by the application of dialogue systems, especially in real-world industry scenarios, in which the dialogue system is unsure whether it should answer the query of user immediately or wait for further supplementary input. Motivated by such an interesting predicament, we define a novel Wait-or-Answer task for dialogue systems. We shed light on a new research topic about how the dialogue system can be more intelligent to behave in this Wait-or-Answer quandary. Further, we propose a predictive approach named Predict-then-Decide (PTD) to tackle this Wait-or-Answer task. More specifically, we take advantage of a decision model to help the dialogue system decide whether to wait or answer. The decision of decision model is made with the assistance of two ancillary prediction models: a user prediction and an agent prediction. The user prediction model tries to predict what the user would supplement and uses its prediction to persuade the decision model that the user has some information to add, so the dialogue system should wait. The agent prediction model tries to predict the answer of the dialogue system and convince the decision model that it is a superior choice to answer the query of user immediately since the input of user has come to an end. We conduct our experiments on two real-life scenarios and three public datasets. Experimental results on five datasets show our proposed PTD approach significantly outperforms the existing models in solving this Wait-or-Answer problem.

Zehao Lin, Shaobo Cui, Guodun Li et al.

Producing natural and accurate responses like human beings is the ultimate goal of intelligent dialogue agents. So far, most of the past works concentrate on selecting or generating one pertinent and fluent response according to current query and its context. These models work on a one-to-one environment, making one response to one utterance each round. However, in real human-human conversations, human often sequentially sends several short messages for readability instead of a long message in one turn. Thus messages will not end with an explicit ending signal, which is crucial for agents to decide when to reply. So the first step for an intelligent dialogue agent is not replying but deciding if it should reply at the moment. To address this issue, in this paper, we propose a novel Imagine-then-Arbitrate (ITA) neural dialogue model to help the agent decide whether to wait or to make a response directly. Our method has two imaginator modules and an arbitrator module. The two imaginators will learn the agent's and user's speaking style respectively, generate possible utterances as the input of the arbitrator, combining with dialogue history. And the arbitrator decides whether to wait or to make a response to the user directly. To verify the performance and effectiveness of our method, we prepared two dialogue datasets and compared our approach with several popular models. Experimental results show that our model performs well on addressing ending prediction issue and outperforms baseline models.