Guangshen Ma

Guangshen Ma, Weston Ross, Patrick J. Codd

This paper focuses on a research problem of robotic controlled laser orientation to minimize errant overcutting of healthy tissue during the course of pathological tissue resection. Laser scalpels have been widely used in surgery to remove pathological tissue targets such as tumors or other lesions. However, different laser orientations can create various tissue ablation cavities, and incorrect incident angles can cause over-irradiation of healthy tissue that should not be ablated. This work aims to formulate an optimization problem to find the optimal laser orientation in order to minimize the possibility of excessive laser-induced tissue ablation. We first develop a 3D data-driven geometric model to predict the shape of the tissue cavity after a single laser ablation. Modelling the target and non-target tissue region by an obstacle boundary, the determination of an optimal orientation is converted to a collision-minimization problem. The goal of this optimization formulation is maintaining the ablated contour distance from the obstacle boundary, which is solved by Projected gradient descent. Simulation experiments were conducted and the results validated the proposed method with conditions of various obstacle shapes and different initial incident angles.

Jie Luo, Guangshen Ma, Sarah Frisken et al.

With the increasing availability of new image registration approaches, an unbiased evaluation is becoming more needed so that clinicians can choose the most suitable approaches for their applications. Current evaluations typically use landmarks in manually annotated datasets. As a result, the quality of annotations is crucial for unbiased comparisons. Even though most data providers claim to have quality control over their datasets, an objective third-party screening can be reassuring for intended users. In this study, we use the variogram to screen the manually annotated landmarks in two datasets used to benchmark registration in image-guided neurosurgeries. The variogram provides an intuitive 2D representation of the spatial characteristics of annotated landmarks. Using variograms, we identified potentially problematic cases and had them examined by experienced radiologists. We found that (1) a small number of annotations may have fiducial localization errors; (2) the landmark distribution for some cases is not ideal to offer fair comparisons. If unresolved, both findings could incur bias in registration evaluation.