Yahong Wang

Yunzhen Yao, Hongye Wang, Yahong Wang et al.

This paper studies test-time aggregation, an approach that generates multiple reasoning traces and aggregates them into a final answer. Most existing methods rely on evaluation signals collected from candidate traces in isolation or answer frequencies, while ignoring comparative interactions among candidates. We propose Joint Consistency (JC), formulated as a constrained Ising-type energy minimization problem, where independent evaluation signals act as external fields and pairwise comparisons act as interactions. JC provides a unified framework for test-time aggregation that subsumes existing voting and weighted aggregation methods as special cases. Our construction of the interaction matrix leverages LLM-as-a-judge comparisons, and admits a theoretical interpretation under answer-level homogeneity assumptions. Moreover, we develop an efficient approximation strategy that makes interaction modeling practical for large-scale test-time aggregation. Experiments on math and code reasoning benchmarks show that JC consistently outperforms existing baselines across tasks, judge models, trace budgets, and trace-generation settings.

Fanqing Meng, Wenqi Shao, Lixin Luo et al.

Text-to-image (T2I) models have made substantial progress in generating images from textual prompts. However, they frequently fail to produce images consistent with physical commonsense, a vital capability for applications in world simulation and everyday tasks. Current T2I evaluation benchmarks focus on metrics such as accuracy, bias, and safety, neglecting the evaluation of models' internal knowledge, particularly physical commonsense. To address this issue, we introduce PhyBench, a comprehensive T2I evaluation dataset comprising 700 prompts across 4 primary categories: mechanics, optics, thermodynamics, and material properties, encompassing 31 distinct physical scenarios. We assess 6 prominent T2I models, including proprietary models DALLE3 and Gemini, and demonstrate that incorporating physical principles into prompts enhances the models' ability to generate physically accurate images. Our findings reveal that: (1) even advanced models frequently err in various physical scenarios, except for optics; (2) GPT-4o, with item-specific scoring instructions, effectively evaluates the models' understanding of physical commonsense, closely aligning with human assessments; and (3) current T2I models are primarily focused on text-to-image translation, lacking profound reasoning regarding physical commonsense. We advocate for increased attention to the inherent knowledge within T2I models, beyond their utility as mere image generation tools. The data will be available soon.