Johannes Dellert

Daniel J. Lawson, Vinesh Solanki, Igor Yanovich et al.

Integrating datasets from different disciplines is hard because the data are often qualitatively different in meaning, scale, and reliability. When two datasets describe the same entities, many scientific questions can be phrased around whether the (dis)similarities between entities are conserved across such different data. Our method, CLARITY, quantifies consistency across datasets, identifies where inconsistencies arise, and aids in their interpretation. We illustrate this using three diverse comparisons: gene methylation vs expression, evolution of language sounds vs word use, and country-level economic metrics vs cultural beliefs. The non-parametric approach is robust to noise and differences in scaling, and makes only weak assumptions about how the data were generated. It operates by decomposing similarities into two components: a `structural' component analogous to a clustering, and an underlying `relationship' between those structures. This allows a `structural comparison' between two similarity matrices using their predictability from `structure'. Significance is assessed with the help of re-sampling appropriate for each dataset. The software, CLARITY, is available as an R package from https://github.com/danjlawson/CLARITY.

Johannes Dellert

This technical report describes a new prototype architecture designed to integrate top-down and bottom-up analysis of non-standard linguistic input, where a semantic model of the context of an utterance is used to guide the analysis of the non-standard surface forms, including their automated normalization in context. While the architecture is generally applicable, as a concrete use case of the architecture we target the generation of semantically-informed target hypotheses for answers written by German learners in response to reading comprehension questions, where the reading context and possible target answers are given. The architecture integrates existing NLP components to produce candidate analyses on eight levels of linguistic modeling, all of which are broken down into atomic statements and connected into a large graphical model using Probabilistic Soft Logic (PSL) as a framework. Maximum a posteriori inference on the resulting graphical model then assigns a belief distribution to candidate target hypotheses. The current version of the architecture builds on Universal Dependencies (UD) as its representation formalism on the form level and on Abstract Meaning Representations (AMRs) to represent semantic analyses of learner answers and the context information provided by the target answers. These general choices will make it comparatively straightforward to apply the architecture to other tasks and other languages.